Opportunities for carbon sequestration in intensive soft fruit production systems
Affiliation:
1. University of Reading, School of Agriculture , Policy and Development , United Kingdom 2. Czech University of Life Science Prague , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences , Praha , Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
The historical contribution of agriculture to human-induced climate change is indisputable; the removal of natural vegetation and soil cultivation to feed the growing human population has resulted in a substantial carbon transfer to the atmosphere. While maintaining their food production capacity, soft fruit production systems now have an opportunity to utilise a recent technology change to enhance their carbon sequestration capacity. We use an example of a farm in South-East England to illustrate how the soft fruit crop production system can be optimised for carbon storage. We performed an audit of carbon stocks in the soil and tree biomass and show that it is imperative to plan crop rotation to establish (semi) permanent inter-row strips that will remain in situ even if the main crop is replaced. These strips should be covered with grassland vegetation, preferable with deeper rooting grass species mixed with species supporting nitrogen fixation. Finally, grassland mowing cuttings should be left in situ and hedgerows and tree windbreaks should be expanded across the farm. Modern soft fruit production systems can enhance their carbon storage while maintaining commercially relevant levels of productivity.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference18 articles.
1. Agostini, F., Gregory, A. S., & Richter, G. M. (2015). Carbon sequestration by perennial energy crops: is the jury still out? Bioenergy research, 8(3), 1057–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9571-010.1007/s12155-014-9571-0473260326855689 2. Błonska, E., Lasota, J., da Silva, G. R. V., Vanguelova, E., Ashwood, F., Tibbett, M., Watts, K., & Lukac, M. (2020). Soil organic matter stabilization and carbon-cycling enzyme activity are affected by land management. Annals of Forest Research, 63(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2019.1837 3. Bondeau, A., Smith, P. C., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Cramer, W., Gerten, D., Lotze-Campen, H., Müller, C., & Reichstein, M. (2007). Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biology, 13(3), 679–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x 4. Briedis, C., de Moraes Sá, J. C., Caires, E. F., de Fátima Navarro, J., Inagaki, T. M., Boer, A., Neto, C. Q., de Oliveira Ferreira, A., Canalli, L. B., & Dos Santos, J. B. (2012). Soil organic matter pools and carbon-protection mechanisms in aggregate classes influenced by surface liming in a no-till system. Geoderma, 170, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.01110.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.011 5. Cheng, W. (1999). Rhizosphere feedbacks in elevated CO2. Tree physiology, 19(4–5), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.4-5.31310.1093/treephys/19.4-5.31312651574
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|