Effectiveness of one-to-one feedback methods of teaching with proper metered-dose inhaler technique and correcting errors in chronic obstructive lung disease patients

Author:

Özkan Çiğdem Gamze1,Kaşikçi Mağfiret2

Affiliation:

1. a Fundamentals of Nursing Department, Health Sciences Faculty, Manisa Celal Bayar University , Manisa , Turkey

2. b Fundamentals of Nursing Department, Nursing Faculty, Atatürk University , Erzurum , Turkey

Abstract

Abstract Objective To determine the most common mistakes made during the use of a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), and the effect of the repeated trainings performed with demonstration method by providing one-to-one feedback on these mistakes. Methods This is a quasi-experimental study with a control group. A total of 100 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (50 in the control group and 50 in the experimental group) were included in the research. “Patient Information Form (PIF)” (to determine the descriptive characteristics of patients) through the face-to-face interview method, using “MDI Skill Assessment Form” (MDISAF) (it is composed of 10 skill steps about the use of MDI) through observation method was used. Patients in both the groups were asked to use MDI and their abilities regarding use of MDI were assessed. Then in the intervention group, usage of MDI was explained by a nurse via demonstration and placebo MDI. Trainings were repeated on days 1,3, and 5 as from hospitalization of the patient. In the intervention group, three methods were used in this study: “face-to-face training,” “one-to-one,” and “with feedbacks and repeated.” Routine training regarding use of MDI was given by the nurses in the clinic to patients in the control group. The use of an MDI was assessed using MDISAF before training and after the training on the first, third and fifth days of hospitalization. On the seventh day, the last measurement was performed. Percentage, chi square, and mean were used to assess the data. Results After repetitive training with one-to-one feedback, several differences between the groups in favor of the experimental group were found in 7 of the 10 skill levels of the MDI. There was a significant difference after “training” between the groups in the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth MDI steps in posttest measurement (P < 0.05). Evaluating the skills of the groups to use MDI from pretest to posttest, it was determined that while the intervention group made less mistakes in steps in which mistakes were made mostly, the control group continued to make mistakes. Conclusions Inhaler technique intervention with repeated, face to face, and one-to-one feedback trainings can significantly enhance the MDI techniques in COPD patients. The patients in the intervention group made less mistakes during MDI application and their application skills improved. It may be asserted that the training provided to the intervention group was effective for using the device correctly, while the training provided in the clinic for the control group was inadequate.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,General Nursing

Reference29 articles.

1. Melani AS, Bonavia M, Mastropasqua E, et al. Time required to rectify inhaler errors among experienced subjects with faulty technique. Respir Care. 2017;62:409–414.

2. Aydemir Y. Misuse of inhalation devices-effective parameters and the role of education. Eurasian J Pulmonol. 2013;15:32–38 (in Turkish).

3. Farooq MZ, Farooq MS, Waqar W, Mustaqeem M, Khan JA, Saadullah S. Assessment of inhalation technique among patients of chronic respiratory disorders in Civil Hospital Karachi: a cross sectional study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66:1502.

4. Haq ZU, Basit A, Iqbal Z, et al. Analysis of metered dose inhaler technique errors in patients with obstructive airway diseases. Pak J Chest Med. 2018;24:64–71.

5. Pothirat C, Chaiwong W, Phetsuk N, Pisalthanapuna S, Chetsadaphan N, Choomuang W. Evaluating inhaler use technique in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:1291.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3