Affiliation:
1. Poznań University of Economics and Business , Department of Statistics , al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań , Poland .
Abstract
Abstract
New data sources, namely big data and the Internet, have become an important issue in statistics and for official statistics in particular. However, before these sources can be used for statistics, it is necessary to conduct a thorough analysis of sources of nonrepresentativeness.
In the article, we focus on detecting correlates of the selection mechanism that underlies Internet data sources for the secondary real estate market in Poland and results in representation errors (frame and selection errors). In order to identify characteristics of properties offered online we link data collected from the two largest advertisements services in Poland and the Register of Real Estate Prices and Values, which covers all transactions made in Poland. Quarterly data for 2016 were linked at a domain level defined by local administrative units (LAU1), the urban/rural distinction and usable floor area (UFA), categorized into four groups. To identify correlates of representation error we used a generalized additive mixed model based on almost 5,500 domains including quarters.
Results indicate that properties not advertised online differ significantly from those shown in the Internet in terms of UFA and location. A non-linear relationship with the average price per m2 can be observed, which diminishes after accounting for LAU1 units.
Reference40 articles.
1. Anenberg, E. and S. Laufer. 2017. “A More Timely House Price Index.” Review of Economics and Statistics 99(4): 722–734. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00634.10.1162/REST_a_00634
2. Beręsewicz, M. 2016. Internet Data Sources for Real Estate Market Statistics. PhD diss., Poznań University of Economics and Business. Available at: http://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/docmetadata?id=393454 (accessed February 2019).
3. Beręsewicz, M. 2017. “A Two-Step Procedure to Measure Representativeness of Internet Data Sources.” International Statistical Review 85(3): 473–493. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12217.10.1111/insr.12217
4. Beręsewicz, M., R. Lehtonen, F. Reis, L. Di Consiglio, and M. Karlberg. 2018. An Overview of Methods for Treating Selectivity in Big Data Sources. Statistical Working Papers. Eurostat. Doi: https://doi.org./10.2785/312232.10.2785/312232
5. Brick, J.M. 2015. “Unit Nonresponse and Weighting Adjustments: A Critical Review.” Journal of Official Statistics 29(3): 329–353. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0026.10.2478/jos-2013-0026
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献