Between paper and plan: contrasting data on urban habitats in literature with planning documents
Author:
Archiciński Piotr1ORCID, Sikorski Piotr1ORCID, Hoppa Adrian1ORCID, Hopkins Richard J.2ORCID, Vitasović-Kosić Ivana3ORCID, Sikorska Daria1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Environmental Engineering , Warsaw Univeristy of Life Sciences—SGGW , Warsaw , Poland 2. Natural Resources Institute , University of Greenwich , London , UK 3. Faculty of Agriculture , University of Zagreb , Svetošimunska cesta 25 , Zagreb , Croatia
Abstract
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the integration of urban habitat data in spatial development documents across Poland’s 28 largest cities and assessed the implications for urban environmental management and biodiversity conservation. The detailed habitat maps identify critical areas for protection, enhancing ecosystem services, and supporting nature-based solutions that positively impact residents’ health and social cohesion. A total of 372 sources were analyzed and 467 habitat types were identified primarily from phytosociological surveys. However, only 33.2% of these habitats have been included in urban planning documents, highlighting a substantial integration gap. Complete taxa lists and habitat maps covering the entire city area, suitable for biodiversity management needs, are rarely included in urban planning documents. The findings have underscored the need for detailed habitat mapping to improve urban environmental management, biodiversity conservation, and public health promotion.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference59 articles.
1. Ahern, J, Cilliers, S & Niemelä, J 2014, ‘The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation’, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 125, pp. 254–259. 2. Aronson, MF, Lepczyk, CA, Evans, KL, Goddard, MA, Lerman, SB, MacIvor, JS, Nilon, CH, & Vargo, T 2017, ‘Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 189–196. 3. Bai, X 2018, ‘Advance the ecosystem approach in cities’, Nature, vol. 559, no. 7712, pp. 7–8. 4. Barton, J & Pretty, J 2010, ‘What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis’, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3947–3955. 5. Boehnke, D, Krehl, A, Mörmann, K, Volk, R, Lützkendorf, T, Naber, E, Becker, R & Norra, S 2022, ‘Mapping urban green and its ecosystem services at microscale—A methodological approach for climate adaptation and biodiversity’, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 15.
|
|