Affiliation:
1. Flinders University , College of Nursing and Health Sciences , 5001 Adelaide Australia
2. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Centre for the Study of Professions , 0130 Oslo , Norway
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
While academics are frequently engaged in research activities and subsequent dissemination of results through publication, all too often they occur without health practitioner involvement. While there are contemporary expectations that health practitioners will be active contributors to their discipline’s body of knowledge, many find it difficult to prioritise research involvement given the demands of direct patient care. With this awareness as a central focus, we undertook a literature review to identify the challenges and facilitators that impact on health practitioners and academics working collaboratively on research and publishing their findings in peer-reviewed journals.
Methods
A configurative systematic review was performed with six electronic databases (Proquest, CINAHL, Medline, ScienceDirect, ERIC, SocINDEX) searched for studies from the disciplines of nursing, social work, allied health professions, health management, psychology and sociology. Manual searches were also undertaken to minimise the risk of missed studies. A rigorous search and retrieval process identified 20 relevant studies for inclusion in the review. The studies were first critically appraised then summarised. These steps were followed by thematic synthesis of the findings of the reviewed studies.
Results
Challenges and facilitators to health practitioners and academics working collaboratively on research activities were found to be related to the interplay between practitioners, academics, educational and health institutions and professional demands. The interplay of these factors emerged as complex.
Conclusion
Strategies have been recommended that may encourage active partnerships between institutions, health practitioners and academics enabling greater research collaborations and subsequent increased publication of their combined achievements.
Reference59 articles.
1. Abbott, A., 1988. The System of Professions. An essay on the division of labor. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS), 2012. EQuIP National Standards. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards, Sydney.
3. Bedoee, L., 2011. Investing in the Future: Social workers talk about research. Br. J. Soc. Work, 41, 557–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq138
4. Behar-Horenstein, L., Johnson, M.L., 2010. Enticing Students to Enter into Undergraduate Research: The instrumentality of an undergraduate course. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 39 (3), 62-70. http://search.proquest.com/openview/c7a80a16033fea9222cc4844d1fef32e/1?pq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=49226 (accessed on 14 December, 2016)
5. Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., Day, L., 2009. Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation (vol.1). Jossey-Bass, CA.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献