Challenges and facilitators for health practitioners and academics engaging in collaborative research and publication: A systematic review / Herausforderungen und Förderfaktoren für gemeinsame Forschung und wissenschaftliche Publikation von Angehörigen verschiedener Gesundheitsberufe aus Praxis und Forschung: ein systematischer Review

Author:

King Lindy1,Zlatanovic Tatjana2,Gillham David1

Affiliation:

1. Flinders University , College of Nursing and Health Sciences , 5001 Adelaide Australia

2. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Centre for the Study of Professions , 0130 Oslo , Norway

Abstract

Abstract Introduction While academics are frequently engaged in research activities and subsequent dissemination of results through publication, all too often they occur without health practitioner involvement. While there are contemporary expectations that health practitioners will be active contributors to their discipline’s body of knowledge, many find it difficult to prioritise research involvement given the demands of direct patient care. With this awareness as a central focus, we undertook a literature review to identify the challenges and facilitators that impact on health practitioners and academics working collaboratively on research and publishing their findings in peer-reviewed journals. Methods A configurative systematic review was performed with six electronic databases (Proquest, CINAHL, Medline, ScienceDirect, ERIC, SocINDEX) searched for studies from the disciplines of nursing, social work, allied health professions, health management, psychology and sociology. Manual searches were also undertaken to minimise the risk of missed studies. A rigorous search and retrieval process identified 20 relevant studies for inclusion in the review. The studies were first critically appraised then summarised. These steps were followed by thematic synthesis of the findings of the reviewed studies. Results Challenges and facilitators to health practitioners and academics working collaboratively on research activities were found to be related to the interplay between practitioners, academics, educational and health institutions and professional demands. The interplay of these factors emerged as complex. Conclusion Strategies have been recommended that may encourage active partnerships between institutions, health practitioners and academics enabling greater research collaborations and subsequent increased publication of their combined achievements.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference59 articles.

1. Abbott, A., 1988. The System of Professions. An essay on the division of labor. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

2. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS), 2012. EQuIP National Standards. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards, Sydney.

3. Bedoee, L., 2011. Investing in the Future: Social workers talk about research. Br. J. Soc. Work, 41, 557–575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq138

4. Behar-Horenstein, L., Johnson, M.L., 2010. Enticing Students to Enter into Undergraduate Research: The instrumentality of an undergraduate course. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 39 (3), 62-70. http://search.proquest.com/openview/c7a80a16033fea9222cc4844d1fef32e/1?pq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=49226 (accessed on 14 December, 2016)

5. Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., Day, L., 2009. Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation (vol.1). Jossey-Bass, CA.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3