Affiliation:
1. 1 British University Vietnam , Hung Yen , Vietnam
2. 2 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
As online learning becomes a recurrent component of higher education, there have been growing interests in the interaction between students and educational resources within digital environments so as to understand and facilitate students’ initiative in managing those resources. The present study is an explorative inquiry into the relationships between students’ self-reported preferences of study materials, their actual usage of those materials and their learning performances in online learning. It focuses on analysing the learning management system’s log files, test results and students’ responses to an evaluative survey of a bachelor business course at a large Belgian university, which was a blended course turned fully online due to the pandemic circumstance. The first research question concerns how preferences relate to the usage of materials. A cluster analysis was conducted to classify students based on their perceived interest and actual access to learning resources. The results show three clusters of students with different preferences and levels of usage towards the four types of study materials provided in the course. However, the majority showed strong favour for multimedia online learning, with Web lectures being prioritised both in perception and access behaviour, while discussion boards receive mixed opinions and the lowest actual participation. The second question follows these up by linking the preference–usage patterns with academic performances. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted to compare the learning performances of students with different preference–usage patterns. The results show no significant differences, which means the students’ preferences and/or usage of study materials has little to no impact on their learning performances in the online course.
Reference20 articles.
1. Atherton, M., Shah, M., Vazquez, J., Griffiths, Z., Jackson, B., & Burgess, C. (2017). Using learning analytics to assess student engagement and academic outcomes in open access enabling programmes. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2017.1309646
2. Bates, A. W. (2019). Media theory. In I. Jung (Ed.), Open and distance education theory revisited (pp. 95–104). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7740-2_11
3. Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., Arnau, J., Bono, R., & Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29(4), 552–557. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383
4. Chan, A., Botelho, M. G., & Lam, O. (2021). An exploration of student access to a learning management system - challenges and recommendations for educators and researchers. European Journal of Dental Education: Official Journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12664
5. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30218684.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献