Röpke and Einaudi: from the Civitas of Persons to the Idea of Europe-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Röpke and Einaudi: from the Civitas of Persons to the Idea of Europe

Published:2018-06-01 Issue:1 Volume:6 Page:1-10
ISSN:2198-6800
Container-title:Journal for Markets and Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Forte Francesco¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Economics and Law , University of Rome “La Sapienza” , Rome , Italy ; Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria , Reggio Calabria , Italy

Abstract

Abstract The first part of the paper deals with the so-called liberal Third Way of Röpke and Einaudi, which has, at its center, the person and civitas umana. Subsidiarity principle, market, and conform public interventions define the role and limits of public powers. The second part presents eight main indicators of the divergent performance of the four main Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) countries. The third part deals with the incompleteness of the institutional construct of the European Union (EU) and the EMU that are clubs of sovereign states in the light of Einaudi’s and Röpke’s ideas. Suggestion about corrections of fiscal compact, banking regulations, and “bail in” and about a closer cooperation between European Central Bank (ECB) monetary policy and European budget and EU fiscal policy concludes the paper.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/jome-2018-0021

Reference88 articles.

1. Alberti L.B. (1432-34), I libri Della Famiglia (ed.1960), Bari.

2. Aßländer M.S., Ulrich P., Einführung: Das Soziale der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Impressionen-Illusionen, In: Michael S.A., Ulrich P. (Eds.), 60 Jahre Soziale Marktwirtschaft: Illusionen und Interpretationen einer ordnungspolitischen Integrationsformel, Bern, 9-26, 2009.

3. Aßländer M.S., Wohlstand für alle? Die Soziale Marktwirtschaft vor der globalen Herausforderung, In: Aßländer M.S., Ulrich P. (Eds.), 60 Jahre Soziale Marktwirtschaft: Illusionen und Interpretationen einer ordnungspolitischen Integrationsformel, Bern, 223-255, 2009.

4. Beqiraj E., Fedeli S., Forte F., Public budgetary rules and GDP growth. An Empirical Study on OECD and European Countries. S Econ J, forthcoming, 2018.

5. Beqiraj E., Fedeli S., Forte F., La validità della regola del bilancio corretto per l’output gap e il rapporto Debito/PIL nell’analisi di Steve del 1952, e nella problematica attuale. Una verifica empirica sui paesi OCSE ed europei, Milano, 2017.