Female Gender Marginality in the Imperial Roman World: Affinity Between Women and Slaves in their Shared Stereotypes and Penetrability

Author:

Berg Inhee Cho Inhee C.1

Affiliation:

1. Concordia University of Edmonton , Department of Philosophy, Religious Studies, and Classics 7128 Ada Blvd NW, Edmonton , AB T5B 4E4 , Canada

Abstract

Abstract The concepts of sex and gender existed in the imperial Roman world. Although there existed a sliding scale of sex and gender, gender was largely pre-determined at the time of one’s birth based on one’s sexual anatomy and concurrently, gender acculturation of the male and the female began. It was a conventional notion that women were marginal compared to freeborn men by the virtue of gender. Although the Romans improved the legal independence of free women, Greco-Roman literary evidence harbors various theoretical positions regarding female social marginality and submission, which were largely associated with slaves, and also underscores the paradox that female position of authority was only meant to be negotiated with the position of subordination. This article deals with the issue of female gender marginality and enculturation of female servility in the imperial Roman world. Various Roman literary traditions link women to slaves in their shared stereotypes and evidence that women and slaves were seen to share affinity for vulnerable penetrability in the face of the male sexual and domestic violence.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Gender Studies

Reference101 articles.

1. Allen, P. 1997. The Concept of Woman: The Aristotelian Revolution, 750 B.C.–C.E. 1250. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eeerdmans.

2. Arjava, A. 1996. Women and Laws in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

3. Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. 1989. “Social Identity Theory and the Organization.” The Academy of Management Review 14/1 (1989), pp. 20–39.

4. Barber, J. 1955. The Road from Eden: Studies in Christianity and Culture. Palo Alto, CA: Academica Press.

5. Bauman, R. 1992. Women and Politics in Ancient Rome. London & New York: Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3