Amylolytic and Cellulolytic Activities, the Digestibility of Dry Matter of Broiler Chickens After Feed Intake of Humic Substances
Author:
Marcin A.1, Naď P.1, Bujňák L.1, Skalická M.1, Hreško Šamudovská A.1
Affiliation:
1. 1 Department of Animal Nutrition and Husbandry , University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice , Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice Slovakia
Abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of feed intake of humic substances (HS) on the cellulolytic and amylolytic activities, and the digestibility of dry matter (DM) in the chymus of the intestine and ileum of broiler chickens (Cobb 500). Four groups of birds (A, B, C, negative control; n = 120) were fed with mash diets (starter HYD1 230.20, grower HYD2 222.20, finisher HYD3 209.40 g crude protein (CP) per kg of DM) with the added HS from day 1 to 37 days as follows: A ‒ 0.7 % Humac nature; B ‒ 0.7 % Humac nature monogastric (HNM); C ‒ 0.5 % HNM (Humac Ltd., Slovakia). The cellulolytic activities were increased in the intestine in B/C by 2.50 (P < 0.01)/1.65 (P < 0.05) on day 3 and 1.02 (P < 0.001)/0.3 (P < 0.05) µmol.l−1.min−1.g−1 on day 24. There were observed higher values of digestibility coefficient of DM in the intestine (P < 0.05) in C by 15.14 % and 14.85 %, and in B by 20.73 % on days 17, 24 and 31, respectively. The enhancement of ileal digestibility of DM was observed in B by 7.38 % (P < 0.05) and CP in A and B by 3.7% and 6.1% (P < 0.05). The feed intake of HS favourably influenced the cellulolytic activities and increased the DM digestibility in the intestine and the ileum, as well as the CP digestibility in the ileum.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference42 articles.
1. 1. Arif, M., Rehman, A., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Saeed, M., Khan, F., Akhtar, M., et al., 2018: Growth, carcass traits, cecal microbial counts, and blood chemistry of meat-type quail fed diets supplemented with humic acid and black cumin seeds. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 31, 12, 1930‒1938. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0148.10.5713/ajas.18.0148621273229879835 2. 2. Arpášová, H., Pistová, V., Hrnčár, C., Fík, M., Haščík, P., 2018: The impact of the humic acid and phytobiotics on performance and carcass parameters of broiler chickens. Acta Fytotechn. Zootechn., 21, 4, 173‒178. DOI: 10.15414/afz. 2018.21.04.173–1 78. 3. 3. Algawany, M., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Farag, M. R., Sachan, S., Karthik, K., Dhama, K., 2018: The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 25, 11, 10611‒10618. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018–1 687-x. 4. 4. Avci, M., Denek, N., Kaplan, O., 2007: Effects of humic acid at different levels on growth performance, carcass yields and some biochemical parameters of quails. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 6, 1, 1‒4. Available at https://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=javaa.2007.1.4. Accessed August 16, 2022. 5. 5. Bahadori, Z., Esmaielzadeh, L., Karimi-Torshizi, M. A., Seidavi, A., Olivares, J., Rojas, S., et al., 2017: The effect of earthworm (Eisenia foetida) meal with vermi-humus on growth performance, haematology, immunity, intestinal microbiota, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Livest. Sci., 202, 74–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci. 2017.05.010.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|