Affiliation:
1. Associate Professor in Social Work , University of Gothenburg , Sweden
2. Assistant professor in Interaction Design , Malmö University , Sweden
3. Senior researcher, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden , Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
The article challenges the notion that crisis communication is a matter of outreach of a single message communicated as “one voice” from official channels speaking to the public about how to prepare for and manage crisis situations. The Covid-19 pandemic has made it evident that the general public is accessing multiple channels for crisis information while the crisis situation, the rules and knowledge are constantly changing. An array of different voices, facts, (fake) news and recommendations are channeled via public service, social media, national and international media. Most of this content is accessed and shared via digital channels, but also via communities, workplaces, and between friends and families living in the same country or abroad. This article presents insights gained from a qualitative study addressing disabled people whose everyday lives have always been characterized by extraordinary circumstances, and continuously so also during the Covid-19 pandemic. The aim was to create an understanding of disabled people’s crisis-specific media practices and their ways of coping with situations caused by the pandemic. Through a national online survey study and workshops, it explores how disabled people experience the pandemic, and how crisis information flows affect trust between authorities and the disability movements. The study should be read in the light of the Swedish Covid-19 strategy, which put a strong emphasis on the individual’s responsibility and that every citizen is expected to follow the recommendations and take precautionary measures to limit the spread of the virus. This approach requires that both public agencies and citizens are capable of navigating the emerging complex crisis communication landscape and requires them to make responsible decisions and take relevant measures.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference91 articles.
1. Aldwin, Carolyn M 2007. Stress, Coping and Development: An Integrative Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
2. Ameis, Stephanie H., Lai, Meng-Chun., Mulsant, Benoit H., & Sxatmari, Peter 2020. ‘Coping, fostering resilience, and driving care innovation for autistic people and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond’. – Mol Autism 11, 1, 61.10.1186/s13229-020-00365-y
3. Bahner, Julia 2017. Vilka röster hörs? Funktionshinderrörelsens karaktär och intressepolitiska arbete. Göteborg: Västra Götalandsregionen, FoUiVäst GR. (In Swedish).
4. Baier, Annette 2013. What is trust? In D. Archard (2013), Reading Onora O’Neill. London & New York: Routledge.
5. Barbero-Recio, Maria., Herrero-Saenz, Margarita., & Segarra, Rafael 2020. ‘Deafness and Mental Health: Clinical Challenges During the COVID-19 Pandemic’. – Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 12, No S1, S212-S213.10.1037/tra0000729
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献