Virtual Representations and Their Ethical Implications

Author:

Mcnamara Robert1

Affiliation:

1. 1 Tallinn University , Estonia

Abstract

Abstract This paper will address ethical concerns surrounding the representation of vulnerable groups as well as the methodological challenges inherent in using artificial intelligence and human-like computer-generated characters in human studies that involve representing such groups. Such concerns focus on consequences arising from the technological affordances of new systems for creating narratives, as well as graphical and audio representations that are capable of portraying beings with close resemblance to humans. Enacting such virtual representations of humans inevitably gives rise to important ethical questions: (1) Who has the right to tell certain stories? (2) Is it ethical to change the medium of a narrative and the identity of a protagonist? (3) Do such changes, or technological mediations, affect whether a vulnerable group will be fairly and accurately portrayed? (4) And what are the implications, either way? While the backdrop of the paper involves discussing the potential of virtual representation as a meditative tool for moral and social change, the ethical implications inherent in the use of new cutting-edge technologies, such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Unreal Engine’s MetaHuman, to create human-like virtual character narratives call for theoretical scrutiny from a methodological perspective.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science

Reference35 articles.

1. Ayers, John W.; Poliak, Adam; Dredze, Mark; Leas, Eric C.; Zhu, Zechariah; Kelley, Jessica B; … Smith, Davey M. 2023. “Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum.” – JAMA Internal Medicine 183, 6, 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838

2. Bodström, Erna. 2020. “Asylum Decisions as Performances: Intertextuality in Internal Credibility Assessment.” – International Journal of Refugee Law 32, 4, 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeab001

3. Brooker, Charlie (writer); Pankiw, Ally (director). 2023, June 15. “Joan Is Awful” (Season 6, Episode 1) [TV series episode]. In B. K. Ali, C. Brooker (executive producers), Black Mirror. Broke & Bones.

4. Buolamwini, Joy; Gebru, Timnit. 2018. “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification.” – Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 8, 1–15. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html

5. Coëgnarts, Maarten. 2017. “Cinema and the Embodied Mind: Metaphor and Simulation in Understanding Meaning in Films.” – Palgrave Communications 3, 17067. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.67

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3