Affiliation:
1. Leipzig University , Germany .
Abstract
Abstract
Climate change has become relevant for central banks worldwide, but they are adopting their instruments at different speeds. This article compares the reactions of the Eurosystem with those of the other EU central banks. Do these central banks differ in their efforts to make their own policies “greener”? The article argues that the options and constraints to react to climate change diverge between central banks.
Reference59 articles.
1. Acharya, V., Imbierowicz, B. Steffen, S., & Teichmann, D. (2020). Does the Lack of Financial Stability Impair the Transmission of Monetary Policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 138(2), 342–365.
2. Arseneau, D. M., Drexler, A., & Osada, M. (2022). Central Bank Communication About Climate Change. Finance and Economics Discussion Series. Federal Reserve Board, Washington D.C.
3. Avgousti, A., Caprioli, F., Caracciolo, G., Cochard, M., Dallari, P., Delgado-Téllez, M., Domingues, J., Ferdinandusse, M., Filip, D., Nerlich, C., Prammer, D., Schmidt, K., & Theofilakou, A. (2023). The Climate Change Challenge and Fiscal Instruments and Policies in the EU. Occasional Paper, 315, European Central Bank.
4. Banca Națională a României. (2021). National Bank of Romania’s Declaration of Engagement as a Member of Network for Greening the Financial System. https://bnr.ro/page.aspx?prid=20097
5. Batsaikhan, U., & Jourdan, S. (2021). Money Looking for a Home [Technical Report]. Positive Money Europe. http://www.positivemoney.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/2021_Building-Renovation-TLTROs.pdf