Stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen in precipitation and river water in Georgia
Author:
Holko Ladislav1, Melikadze George2, Todadze Mariam2, Chitanava Ramaz3, Chankvetadze Aleksandre2, Chikadze Tornike2, Gventsadze Alexander2, Gaphrindashvili Merab3
Affiliation:
1. 1 Institute of Hydrology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences , Dúbravská cesta 9, 841 04 Bratislava , Slovakia . 2. 2 M. Nodia Institute of Geophysics of I. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University , Aleksidze 1, 0160 Tbilisi , Georgia . 3. 3 National Environmental Agency of Georgia , Marshall Gelovani 34, 0159 Tbilisi , Georgia .
Abstract
Abstract
The article presents the first comprehensive evaluation of the isotopic composition of precipitation and runoff in Georgia. It is based on data from the monitoring of δ18O and δ2H in monthly precipitation at eleven precipitation stations and monthly runoff from five large, mostly nested catchments in Georgia, collected between the years 2013 and 2022. The data represent different climatic and altitudinal conditions ranging from the wet western part of Georgia affected by the Black Sea to the dry eastern part of the county presumably affected also by the air masses from the Caspian Sea. Specific conditions affecting the isotopic composition of precipitation and river water seem to occur close to the main ridge of the Greater Caucasus Mountains. We defined the National Meteoric Water Line (NMWL) and the National River Water Line (NRWL) for Georgia as well as the Local Meteoric Water Lines (LMWLs) and River Water Lines (RWLs) for individual precipitation stations and river gauges and investigated their slopes and intercepts. Altitude gradients of δ18O and δ2H in the rivers were similar to those in precipitation (–0.16‰ and –1.2‰ per 100 m of altitude for δ18O and δ2H, respectively). The rivers were supplied from precipitation of the colder part of the year (November/December to March/April) while the isotopic composition of precipitation in the remaining warmer part of the year was clearly detached from that of the rivers. The isotopic signal in precipitation was dampened in the rivers by a factor of 5–6. The scaled line-conditioned excess (lc-excess*) did not indicate any significant deviations of river waters from meteorological conditions in the catchments.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference42 articles.
1. Aggarwal, P.K., Alduchov, O.A., Froehlich, K.O., Araguás-Araguás, L., Sturchio, N.C., Kurita, N., 2012. Stable isotopes in global precipitation: A unified interpretation based on atmospheric moisture residence time. Geoph. Res. Let., 39, L11705. DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051937 2. Bowen, G.J., Revenaugh, J., 2003. Interpolating the isotopic composition of modern meteoric precipitation. Water Resour. Res., 39, 10, 1299. DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002086 3. Fourth National Communication of Georgia to the UNFCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), 2021. Ministry of Environment Protection and Agriculture of Georgia, Tbilisi, 425 p. 4. Fritz, P., 1981. River waters. In: Gat, J.R., Gonfiantini, R. (Eds.): Stable Isotopic Hydrology: Deuterium and Oxygen-18 in the Water Cycle. International Atomic Energy Agency, Technical Report Series, 210, pp. 177–201. 5. Diadin, D., Vystavna, Y., 2020. Long-term meteorological data and isotopic composition in precipitation, surface water and groundwater revealed hydrologic sensitivity to climate change in East Ukraine. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 56, 2, 136–148. DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2020.1732369
|
|