Analysis of the Cultivation Mechanism of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ability of College Students in the Context of Information Age
Affiliation:
1. 1 Enrollment and Employment Division , Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology , Zhengzhou , Henan , , China .
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, under the background of the information era, according to the control theory of education of Innovation and Creation in institutions of higher education, the evaluation index system of education of Innovation and Creation resources is constructed. In order to optimize the allocation of education of Innovation and Creation resources in institutions of higher education, multi-objective optimization analysis of education of Innovation and Creation resources in institutions of higher education is carried out and combined with the objective function and indicator weights as well as the MOPSO algorithm, which in turn completes the multi-objective optimization analysis model. We establish the research variables, analyze and research scheme, and carry out an empirical analysis of the education of Innovation and Development in higher education institutions against the backdrop of information technology. These form the basis of the study’s methodology for teaching Creative Thinking and Creation mechanisms in higher education institutions. The findings indicate that prior to the experiment, the model’s resource allocation efficiency for Innovation and Creation education varied significantly amongst schools, ranging from a minimum of 0.122 to a maximum of 0.186; after optimization, the allocation efficiency was 0.188, with a mean increase of 20.88%, thereby realizing the optimization of Innovation and Creation education resource allocation.Regarding the optimization of education for innovation and the creation of resource allocation. On education of Innovation and Creation, the interaction term of new entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurship includes the regression coefficient of education of Innovation and Creation*entrepreneurship is 0.038 (Model16: β = 0.038, p<0.001), and it is significant at the level of 0.001, and there is always a positive interaction effect between education of Innovation and Creation and entrepreneurship in the influence on intention. This study can provide a better platform for entrepreneurial practice for students, which is of great importance in enhancing their innovation consciousness and practical abilities in college.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Modeling and Simulation,General Computer Science
Reference22 articles.
1. Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., & Yeow, J. (2014). Barriers to innovation through public procurement: a supplier perspective. Technovation, 34(10), 631-645. 2. Dias, A. S. M. E., António Abreu, Navas, H. V. G., & Santos, R. (2020). Proposal of a holistic framework to support sustainability of new product innovation processes. Sustainability, 12. 3. Konara, P., Batsakis, G., & Shirodkar, V. (2022). ‘distance’ in intellectual property protection and mnes’ foreign subsidiary innovation performance. Journal of product innovation management. 4. Badstue, L., Petesch, P., Farnworth, C. R., Roeven, L., & Hailemariam, M. (2020). Women farmers and agricultural innovation: marital status and normative expectations in rural ethiopia. Sustainability, 12. 5. Živil Stankeviiūt, Stanikien, E., & Cigan, U. (2020). Sustainable hrm as a driver for innovative work behaviour: do respect, openness, and continuity matter? the case of lithuania. Sustainability, 12(14), 5511.
|
|