Mappism: formalizing classical and artificial life views on mind and consciousness

Author:

Bładek Iwo1,Komosinski Maciej1,Miazga Konrad1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Computing Science , Poznan University of Technology , Piotrowo 2, 60-965 Poznan , Poland .

Abstract

Abstract Throughout centuries philosophers have attempted to understand the disparity between the conscious experience and the material world – i.e., the problem of consciousness and the apparent mind–body dualism. Achievements in the fields of biology, neurology, and information science in the last century granted us more insight into processes that govern our minds. While there are still many mysteries to be solved when it comes to fully understanding the inner workings of our brains, new discoveries suggest stepping away from the metaphysical philosophy of mind, and closer to the computational viewpoint. In light of the advent of strong artificial intelligence and the development of increasingly complex artificial life models and simulations, we need a well-defined, formal theory of consciousness. In order to facilitate this, in this work we introduce mappism. Mappism is a framework in which alternative views on consciousness can be formally expressed in a uniform way, thus allowing one to analyze and compare existing theories, and enforcing the use of the language of mathematics, i.e, explicit functions and variables. Using this framework, we describe classical and artificial life approaches to consciousness.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference41 articles.

1. [1] Adams D. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Pan Books, 1979.

2. [2] Bedau M. A. Artificial life: organization, adaptation and complexity from the bottom up. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(11):505–512, 2003.

3. [3] Buckingham G., Michelakakis E. E., and Rajendran G. The influence of prior knowledge on perception and action: Relationships to autistic traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(5):1716–1724, May 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0, doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0.10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0,doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2701-0

4. [4] Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1996.

5. [5] Chalmers D. J. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3):200–219, 1995.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3