Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work , Babeș-Bolyai University , Cluj-Napoca .
Abstract
Abstract
The primary main aim of this article is to explore the changes and adjustments brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic to the therapeutic process in the transition from face-to-face talking therapy to online therapy. Online therapy sessions, once a niche, have now become the norm in therapeutic work. This, more than ever before, raises the question of the efficacy of online therapy compared to face-to-face talking therapy. A related question is how the “classical” elements of in-person therapies (especially the psychodynamic, affective and relational-based), such as: the therapeutic alliance, the therapeutic containing space, the therapeutic relationship, etc. work in the on-line setting. This article draws on a primary qualitative exploratory research carried among Romanian clients who undergo a psychodynamic type of therapy and who transitioned from face-to-face to online therapy as a reaction to the new constraints engendered by the COVID-19 pandemic and after the measures were relaxed, the transition from on-line to in-person therapy. Our focus is on how they experience online therapy compared to face-to-face therapy in terms of intimacy, therapeutic frame and efficacy, as well as on the boundaries challenged, erased and created by the switch between the two types of therapy settings.
Reference19 articles.
1. Agar, Gily (2020). The Clinic Offers No Advantage Over the Screen, for Relationship is Everything. In Weinberg, Haim and Rolnick, Arnon (eds.). Theory and Practice of Online Therapy. Internet-delivered Interventions for Individuals, Groups, Families, and Organisation. NY & London: Routledge, pp. 66-78.10.4324/9781315545530-6
2. Alyami, Mohsen (2015). Ethical Dilemmas of Confidentiality in Rural Communities. Management and Recommendations. Arab Journal of Psy Science, 46: 129-133
3. Berger, Viktor (13 May 2020). Phenomenology of Online Spaces: Interpreting Late Modern Spatialities. Human Studies, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341345177], 20 June 2020.
4. Dix, Alan (2009). Paths and Patches: Patterns of Geognosy and Gnosis. In Turner Phil; Turner, Susan; and Davenport, Elisabeth (eds.), Exploration of space, technology, and spatiality: interdisciplinary perspectives. NY: Information Science Reference: Hershey, 1-16.10.4018/978-1-60566-020-2.ch001
5. Doyle, Denise (2017). Avatar Lives: Narratives of Transformation and Identity. In Gackenbach, Jayne and Bown, Johnathan (eds.). Boundaries of Self and Reality Online: Implications of Digitally Constructed Realities. 1st Edition. London, UK: Academic Press, 57-74.10.1016/B978-0-12-804157-4.00004-9
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献