East Asian Strategies for Combating Income Inequality: A Comparative Analysis of Redistributive Fiscal Policy Efforts in China and Korea

Author:

Menz KatharinaORCID

Abstract

Abstract Both China and Korea face different stages of national income inequality as well as distinctive structures in their income distribution. However, not only do levels and structures of income inequality differ in China and Korea, but their measures to tackle income inequality inherently differ. This article investigates how the Chinese and Korean governments respond to income inequality in their countries by analysing fiscal policy on both the expenditure and taxation fronts. The findings show that both China and Korea have increased their redistributive efforts in the recent past; however, Korea’s commitment to tackling income inequality is stronger than that of China. Moreover, this article finds evidence for distinctive strategies for reducing income inequality in China and Korea. Responding to large income disparities at the bottom of the income distribution spectrum, the Chinese government tackles income inequality by supporting low income earners and reducing the tax burden for low income brackets. In contrast, given Korean income inequality can be largely explained by relatively large top income shares, the redistributive policy incorporates newly introduced social benefits excluding top income earners as well as income taxes aimed at the top of the income spectrum.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference94 articles.

1. Acemoglu, Daron and J. S. Pischke. 2001. “Changes in the Wage Structure, Family Income, and Children’s Education.” European Economic Review, 45 (4–6), pp. 890–904.

2. Agnello, Luca and Ricardo M. Sousa. 2014. “How Does Fiscal Consolidation Impact on Income Inequality?” Review of Income and Wealth, 60 (4), pp. 702–726. doi:10.1111/roiw.12004.

3. Ahn, Kookshin. 1997. “Trends in and Determinants of Income Distribution in Korea.” Journal of Economic Development, 22 (2), pp. 27–56.

4. Alvaredo, Facundo, Lucas Chancel, Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman. 2018. “World Inequality Report 2018.” Online: https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf (accessed: July 14, 2020).

5. An, Chong-Bum and Barry Bosworth. 2013. Income Inequality in Korea: An Analysis of Trends, Causes, and Answers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Asia Center.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3