Optimization of Extraction Parameters of Ethanol Extracts of Propolis Samples Using Artificial Neural Network and Moth-Flame Optimization Algorithm
Author:
Gurgen Ayşenur1, Serencam Huseyin2, Kara Yakup3, Can Zehra4, Yıldız Sibel1
Affiliation:
1. Karadeniz Technical University , Faculty of Forest, Forest Industry Engineering , Trabzon , Turkey 2. Trabzon University , School of Applied Sciences, Gastronomy and Culinary Arts , Trabzon , Turkey 3. Karadeniz Technical University , Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry , Trabzon , Turkey 4. Faculty of Applied Sciences , Bayburt University , , Bayburt , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
In this study, the optimum values of propolis ethanol extracts parameters were determined with the use of single and multi-objective optimization procedures. The euclidean distance approach was used in the multi-objective optimization process. Firstly, propolis was extracted using water with ethanol contents 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80% for 8, 10, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h. Then, total phenolic content (TPC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) activities of all extracts were determined. With the obtained data a prediction model was produced with the use of artificial neural networks (ANN), and optimization was performed using a moth-flame (MFO) algorithm. The best prediction models for the TPC and FRAP were observed in 2-5-1 and 2-5-1 network architecture with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values, 5.126 and 2.451%, respectively. For maximum TPC, the extraction parameters were determined as ethanol content 57.5% and extraction time 13.56 h. To maximize FRAP, the optimized extraction parameters were ethanol content 72.03% and extraction time 18.04 h. The optimum extraction conditions for both maximum values of the studied assays were ethanol content 70.03% and extraction time 16.93 h. The study concluded that the integrated ANN and MFO algorithm system can be used in single and multi-objective optimization of extraction parameters. The established optimization model can save time, money, labor and energy.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Insect Science,Plant Science
Reference26 articles.
1. Aliyazicioglu, R., Sahin, H., Ertürk, O., Kolayli, S. (2013). Properties of phenolic composition and biological activity of propolis from Turkey. International Journal of Food Properties, 16(2), 277–287. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2010.551312 2. Bankova, V.S., De Castro, S.L., Marcucci, M.C. (2000). Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie, 31(1), 3–15. DOI: 10.1051/apido:2000102 3. Benzie, I.F., & Strain, J.J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 239(1), 70–76. DOI: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292 4. Can, Z., Yildiz, O., Sahin, H., Asadov, A., Kolayli, S. (2015). Phenolic profile and antioxidant potential of propolis from Azerbaijan. Mellifera, 15(1), 16–28. 5. Casquete, R., Castro, S.M., Jácome, S., Teixeira, P. (2016). Antimicrobial activity of ethanolic extract of propolis in “Alheira”, a fermented meat sausage. Cogent Food Agriculture, 2(1), 1125774. DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2015.1125774
|
|