Author:
Carral Sandra,Vergez Christophe,Nederveen Cornelis
Abstract
AbstractReed woodwind instruments differ in both their geometry (mainly cylindrical or mainly conical) and their excitation mechanism (single or double reed). How much of the resulting sound is due to the single/double reed, and how much to the geometry of the instrument? Measurements done by Almeidaet al.(J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,121, 1, 536-546, 2007) show that the flow vs pressure characteristic curve of an oboe reed is not that different from that of a clarinet reed, the only difference probably being due to pressure recovery inside the conical staple. Is it possible to make a single reed mouthpiece for an oboe, while keeping the conical staple, that would still give the oboe its characteristic sound? To find it out, a mouthpiece with the following characteristics was made: A standard clarinetBb reed can be attached to it, its volume is approximately that of the missing part of the instrument cone, and a standard French oboe staple can be inserted to it, so that it can be inserted in the usual way in any french oboe. In this paper, the first prototype of the mouthpiece is shown. Also, a sound comparison of the oboe sounds played with this mouthpiece and a standard double reed by a professional player is presented.
Subject
Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Reference12 articles.
1. Almeida A. (2006), The physics of double-reed wind instruments and its application to sound synthesis, Ph.D Thesis, Université Paris VI.
2. Quasistatic nonlinear characteristics of double-reed instruments;A. Almeida;Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2007
3. Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception of Musical Sounds
4. Musical Instruments
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献