BlockChain Platforms in Financial Services: Current Perspective
Author:
Bringas Pablo Garcia1, Pastor-López Iker1, Psaila Giuseppe2
Affiliation:
1. University of Deusto , Bilbao - Spain 2. University of Bergamo , Bergamo - Italy
Abstract
Abstract
Background
BlockChain technology was invented to support bitcoin, currently the most popular virtual currency.
Objectives
The purpose of this paper is to investigate contemporary BlockChain platforms in financial services.
Methods/Approach
An unstructured literature review has been used.
Results
BlockChain in financial services is mostly associated with bitcoin exchange. However, this is a partial view of both BlockChain technology and its possible adoption for financial services: in fact, many BlockChain platforms are now available and many different financial services can be effectively supported by BlockChain platforms, even though they are not based on virtual-money exchange. Furthermore, people are attracted by the concept of smart contract, i.e., a contract that is automatically executed by computer technology, without human intervention.
Conclusions
The contribution of this paper is twofold: first of all, we introduce the four BlockChain platforms that are now most popular, discussing how they support the smart contract concept; second, we identify some typical categories of financial services, matching each of them with the platform that provides the best support for each category.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Information Systems,Management Information Systems
Reference29 articles.
1. 1. Atzei, N., Bartoletti, M., Cimoli, T., Lande, S., Zunino, R. (2018), “SoK: Unraveling bitcoin smart contracts”, In Bauer, L., Küsters, R. (Eds.), 7th International Conference Principles of Security and Trust, 14-20 April, ETAPS, Thessaloniki, pp. 217-242. 2. 2. Beccuti, J., Jaag, C. (2017), “The bitcoin mining game: On the optimality of honesty in proof-of-work consensus mechanism”, Swiss Economics Working Paper 0060, Swiss Economics SE AG, Zürich August 2017. 3. 3. Bordogna, G., Capelli, S., Ciriello, D. E., Psaila, G. (2018), “A cross-analysis framework for multi-source volunteered, crowdsourced, and authoritative geographic information: The case study of volunteered personal traces analysis against transport network data”, Geo-spatial Information Science, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 257-271. 4. 4. Bordogna, G., Capelli, S., Psaila, G. (2017), “A big geo data query framework to correlate open data with social network geotagged posts”, In Bregt A., Sarjakoski T., van Lammeren R., Rip F. (Eds.), Annual International Conference on Geographic Information Science, 9-12 May, Springer, Cham, pp.185-203. 5. 5. Bouri, E., Gupta, R., Roubaud, D. (2019), “Herding behaviour in cryptocurrencies”, Finance Research Letters, Vol. 29, pp. 216-221.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|