Determination of the antibacterial effect of bee venom against rainbow trout pathogens and antibiotic resistance gene expression
Author:
Kabakci Dilek1, Ürkü Çiğdem2, Önalan Şükrü3
Affiliation:
1. 1 Muş Alparslan University, Faculty of Applied Sciences , Department of Animal Production and Technologies , Muş , Turkey 2. 2 Istanbul University, Faculty of Aquatic Sciences , Department of Fish Diseases , , Istanbul / Turkey 3. 3 Van Yuzuncu Yil University , Faculty of Fisheries, Department of Fish Diseases , , Van / Turkey .
Abstract
Abstract
Bee venom (BV) is a rich source of secondary metabolites from honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). It contains a variety of bioactive ingredients including peptides, proteins, enzymes, and volatile metabolites. This study investigated the antibacterial effects of the bee venom obtained from honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) against bacterial fish pathogens, such as Lactococcus garvieae (Lg1, Lg2, Lg3), Vibrio anguillarum (Va1, Va2, Va3), Yersinia ruckeri (Yr1, Yr2, Yr3), and Aeromonas hydrophila (Ah1, Ah2, Ah3) and the expression levels on the antibiotic resistance genes hly and fbp (hemolysin and fibronectin-binding prot) of them. It was determined that bee venom had an antibacterial effect against L. garvieae, L. anguillarum, and Y. ruckeri strains, while it had no effect only against Ah3 and Ah2 bacterial strains. As staded by the gene expression of hly (hemolysin) and fbp (fibronectin-binding protein), among the antibiotic resistance genes the effect levels of bee venom on bacterial species varied, although it affected antibiotic resistance and gene expression level in all bacteria. It was revealed that the expression level was the highest for V. anguillarum strains, whereas it was below the control group for L. garvieae. i.e the effect of bee venom on the resistance mechanism for L. garvieae was much less compared to V. anguillarum. Based on the results in the current study it could be concluded that applying bee venom to pathogenic bacteria that cause mortality in the aquaculture sector could induce the defense-related gene and change the broad-spectrum biocontrol activity at the molecular level.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference43 articles.
1. Massa F, Aydın I, Fezzardi D, Akbulut B, Atanasoff A, Beken AT, Bekh V, Buhlak Y, Burlachenko I, Can E, Carboni S, Caruso F, Dağtekin M, Demianenko K, Deniz H, Fidan D, Fourdain L, Frederiksen M, Guchmanidze A, Hamza H, Harvey J, Nenciu M, Nikolov G, Niţă V, Özdemir MD, Petrova-Pavlova E, Popescu G, Rad F, Seyhaneyildiz Can Ş, Theodorou JA, Thomas B, Tonachella N, Tribilustova E, Yakhontova I, Yesilsu AF, Yücel-Gier G: Black Sea aquaculture: Legacy, challenges and future opportunities. Aquac Stud 2021, 21(4): 181-220. 2. Francis-Floyd R, Wellborn TL: Introduction to fish health management. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. 1991, 1-5. 3. Irianto A, Autin B: Probiotics in aquaculture. J Fish Dis 2002, 25: 633-642. 4. Austin B, Austin DA: Bacterial fish pathogens. In: Vibrionaceae representatives. 2012, 481-482. 5. Toranzo AE, Magariños B, Romalde JL: A review of the main bacterial fish diseases in mariculture systems. Aquaculture 2005, 1(4): 37-61.
|
|