Affiliation:
1. University of Jordan , Jordan
2. Al Ain University , UAE
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to examine the comprehension of L2 metonymies by Arabic-speaking EFL learners and to investigate the extent to which the participants’ L1 conceptual and linguistic knowledge of metonymies can affect the processing of L2 metonymies. A comprehension task was administered to elicit data, and the results showed that the participants encountered various degrees of difficulty comprehending different types of metonymies. Though metonymy has been regarded as a universal cognitive device, numerous factors can collaborate to hinder its comprehension process. The researchers argued that the non-conventionality of conceptual metonymies, the non-compositional nature of metonymy processing, the lack of direct exposure to metonymy as a cognitive referential device in L2, and the differences between L1 and L2 possibly contributed to the participants’ faulty answers on the administered test. The study concluded with a set of pedagogical implications and recommendations for further research studies.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference47 articles.
1. Alnamer, A. S. M., Altakhaineh, A. R. M. and Alnamer, S. A. S., 2019. On the appreciation of English punny jokes by Arabic-speaking EFL learners. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54-67.
2. Al-Sharafi, A., 2004. Textual metonymy: A semiotic approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403938909
3. Altakhaineh, A.R.M. and Zibin, A., 2017. The effect of incidental learning on the comprehension of English affixes by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: Acquisition and application. Research in Language, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 405-423.10.1515/rela-2017-0023
4. Barcelona, A., 2002. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In: R. Dirven and R. Parings, eds. Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 207-277.
5. Barcelona, A., 2011. Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In: R. Benczes, A. Barcelona and F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, eds. Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.7-57.10.1075/hcp.28.02bar
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献