Use of Probiotic <i>Bacillus megaterium</i> NCH 55 for Treatment of Subclinical Mastitis in Cows – Preliminary Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Use of Probiotic Bacillus megaterium NCH 55 for Treatment of Subclinical Mastitis in Cows – Preliminary Study

Published:2022-10-01 Issue:2 Volume:45 Page:209-214
ISSN:1857-7415
Container-title:Macedonian Veterinary Review
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Shkromada Oksana¹,Pikhtirova Alina²,Pecka-Kiełb Ewa³,Skliar Oleksandr⁴,Musiienko Yurii¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , Sumy National Agrarian University , Sumy , Ukraine

2. Department of Public Health, Medical Institute , Sumy State University , Sumy , Ukraine

3. Department of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences , Wroclaw , Poland

4. Department of Therapy, Pharmacology, Clinical Diagnostics and Chemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , Sumy National Agrarian University , Sumy , Ukraine

Abstract

Abstract The development and implementation of new and safe means of treating subclinical mastitis (SM) in the production process remains a pressing problem. Our study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of the Bacillus megaterium NCH 55 strain on cow SM. All animals with signs of SM were fed with a basic diet with probiotic’s addition of 15 g/per day. The experiment was conveyed in 30 consecutive days. Milk and blood were collected on the 7th, 15th, and 30th day of the experiment. Daily milk yield was increased by 32.2% and somatic cell count was decreased from 290.00±32.12 to 96.80±39.03 ths/cm3. A decrease in inflammation was indicated by a decrease in POM370 (by 2.2 times) and POM430 (by 2.8 times). No significant changes in the blood serum indices of cows were observed. A probiotic’s positive effect has been established on the treatment of SM. The probiotic B. megaterium NСH 55 can be considered as an alternative to antibiotics and other chemotherapeutic drugs for treating SM in cows.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Veterinary

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/macvetrev-2022-0023

Reference24 articles.

1. 1. Ruegg, P.L. (2017). 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention. J Dairy Sci. 100(12): 10381-10397. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13023 PMid:2915317129153171

2. 2. Le Marechal, C., Thiéry, R., Vautor, E., Loir, Y.L. (2011). Mastitis impact on technological properties of milk and quality of milk products - A Review. Dairy Sci Technol. 91, 247-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-011-0009-6

3. 3. Pecka, E., Zachwieja, A., Tumanowicz. J. (2013). Technological parameters of milk depending on the cow housing system, nutrition system, age and number of somatic cells. Przemysł Chem. 92(6): 1087-1091.

4. 4. Shkromada, O., Skliar, O., Pikhtirova, A., Gerun, I. (2019). Pathogens transmission and cytological composition of cow’s milk. Acta Vet Eurasia. 45, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.26650/actavet.2019.19004

5. 5. Elias, L., Balasubramanyam, A.S., Ayshpur, O.Y., Mushtuk, I.U., Sheremet, N.O., Gumeniuk, V.V., Musser, J., Rogovskyy, A.S. (2020). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Escherichia coli isolated from mastitic dairy cattle in Ukraine. Antibiotics 9(8): 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9080469 PMid:32752205 PMCid:PMC7459615745961532752205

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Determination of the effect of the enzyme and probiotic complex on animal productivity;Scientific Horizons;2024-04-10

2. Effectiveness of probiotics in growing broiler chicken;Scientific Horizons;2023-12

3. Increased lactation in females due to the use of probiotic-based feed additives;Scientific Horizons;2023-08-20

4. Efficiency of probiotic culture consortium application for disinfection of dairy farm premises and prevention of mastitis in cows;Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research;2023