Assessment Tasks to Measure Systems Thinking and Critical Thinking in Organic Chemistry-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Assessment Tasks to Measure Systems Thinking and Critical Thinking in Organic Chemistry

Published:2019-12-01 Issue:2 Volume:27 Page:251-262
ISSN:2067-2446
Container-title:Acta Chemica Iasi
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Timofte Roxana S.¹,Popuș Bianca T.²

Affiliation:

1. Babeş-Bolyai University , Faculty of Psychology and Science of Education, Department of Science and Mathematics Education , Moţilor Street no. 11, Cluj-Napoca 400001 , Romania

2. Babeş-Bolyai University , Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering , Arany János Street no.11, Cluj-Napoca 400028 , Romania

Abstract

Abstract Humans of 21st century should possess higher order thinking skills such as critical thinking and systems thinking skills. Development and assessment of students’ critical thinking and systems thinking skills should be a crucial objective for every teacher. However, only relatively recently the scientists proposed models for the development of items to measure systems thinking and critical thinking. Herein are presented theoretical issues regarding systems thinking and critical thinking, as well as examples of items which could be used to assess systems thinking and critical thinking, on the topic of manipulation of functional groups in organic chemistry.

Publisher

Editura Universitatii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iasi

Reference31 articles.

1. 1. Zuckerman, M. Study reorganization and changes in learning emphases: requisitioned survey as background material for the work of the specialists committee on the subject of “pioneer research: suggestion for reorganized learning”, 2012, retrieved on 18.05.2019 from http://education.academy.ac.il

2. 2. Brookhart, S. M. How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom; ASCD; Alexandria, VA, 2010, pp 1-38.

3. 3. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D.R. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longman, White Plains, NY, 1956, pp 10-24.

4. 4. Marzano, R. J., Kendall, J. S. The new taxonomy of educational objectives, 2nd ed., CA: Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2007, pp 1-21.

5. 5. Stowe, R.; Cooper, M. M.; Stowe, R.; Cooper, M. M. Practicing what we preach: assessing “critical thinking” in organic chemistry. J. Chem. Educ.2017, 94, 1852-1859.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review;Systems Research and Behavioral Science;2021-10-04