Affiliation:
1. Health & Technology Research Centre, Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisbon , Portugal
2. Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon , Portugal
3. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon , Portugal
Abstract
Abstract
In bakeries, a number of operations such as mixing are associated with exposure to air-suspended flour dust and related bioburden. The aim of this study was to find the best active sampling approach to the assessment of occupational exposure to bioburden in Portuguese bakeries based on the data obtained with the use of specific impaction and impinger devices. We used impaction to collect fungal particles from 100 L air samples onto malt extract agar (MEA) supplemented with chloramphenicol (0.05 %). For growing fungi we also used dichloran glycerol (DG18) agar-based media and for mesophilic bacteria we used tryptic soy agar (TSA) supplemented with nystatin (0.2 %). For Enterobacteriaceae we used violet red bile agar (VRBA). With impingers we also collected 300 L air samples at the 300 L/min airflow rate, inoculated onto the same culture media. The two methods, impaction and impinger, showed statistically significant differences in the following counts: fungal on MEA (z=-2.721, p=0.007), fungal on DG18 (z=-4.830, p=0.000), total bacteria (z=-5.435, p=0.000), and Gram-negative coliforms (z=-3.716, p=0.000). In all cases the impaction method detected significantly higher concentrations than the impinger method. Fungal and bacterial loads were higher in the production unit and lower in the shop. The fungal load obtained with impaction varied between 10 and 5140 CFU m-3, and total bacterial counts ranged between 10 and 4120 CFU m-3. This study has shown that the impaction method is the best active sampling approach to assessing viable bioburden in this specific occupational environment, but a multi-faceted approach to sampling and analyses combining methods and media enables a more refined risk characterisation and, consequently, better tailored risk control measures to reduce adverse health outcomes in workers.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Toxicology
Reference37 articles.
1. 1. Wang CH, Chen BT, Han BC, Liu ACY, Hung PC, Chen CY, Chao HJ. Field evaluation of personal sampling methods for multiple bioaerosols. PLoS One 2015:10:e0120308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120308
2. 2. Reponen T. Sampling for microbial determinations. In: Viegas C, Viegas S, Quintal Gomes A, Taubel M, Sabino R, editors. Exposure to microbiological agents in indoor and occupational environments. Springer International Publishing 2017. p. 85-96. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61688-9_4
3. 3. Viegas C, Pinheiro C, Sabino R, Viegas S, Brandão J Veríssimo C, editors. Environmental Mycology in Public Health: Fungi and Mycotoxins Risk Assessment and Management. 1st ed. Academic Press 2015.
4. 4. Heldal KK, Halstensen AS, Thorn J, Djupesland P, Wouters I, Eduard W, Halstensen TS. Upper airway inflammation in waste handlers exposed to bioaerosols. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:444-50. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.6.444
5. 5. Bang B, Aasmoe L, Aamodt BH, Aardal L, Andorsen GS, Bolle R, Bøe R, Van Do T, Evans R, Florvåg E, Gram IT, Huser PO, Kramvik E, Løchen ML, Pedersen B, Rasmussen T. Exposure and airway effects of seafood industry workers in northern Norway. J Occup Environ Med 2005;47:482-92. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000161732.96555.2b
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献