Comparative Analysis of Fruit Tree–Based Agroforestry and Monoculture in Tackling Climate Change Challenges: Evidence from Sofi District, Ethiopia
Author:
Bogale Daba1, Estifanos Solomon2, Asfaw Zebene3
Affiliation:
1. 1 Ethiopian Forest Development , P.O.Box 708 , Dire Dawa , Ethiopia 2. 2 Haramaya University , P.O. Box 138 , Dire Dawa , Ethiopia 3. 3 Hawassa University , P.O.Box 05 Hawassa , Sidama , Ethiopia
Abstract
Abstract
The effects of climate change have hit the agriculture sector in Africa hard. Making adjustments to adapt to the changing environment is critical for countries like Ethiopia, whose primary source of income is subsistence agriculture, which is heavily reliant on rainfall. As a result, establishing context-specific adaptation approaches is crucial for reducing the adverse effects of climate change. This study was conducted at Sofi district, Harari Regional State, Ethiopia, to compare the contribution of fruit tree–based agroforestry and monoculture in tackling climate change challenges. To choose two kebeles and 102 household heads, multistage random sampling was used. Soil and biomass measurements were used to collect soil samples and biomass samples. According to the findings of the study, there are significant differences in how agroforestry and monoculture smallholder farmers deal with climate change challenges in terms of livelihood strategies, with agroforestry smallholders being more resilient. Carbon stock accumulation was estimated to be 453.32 mg ha−1 in agroforestry and 124.7 mg ha−1 in monoculture, where no trees were found on monoculture land. The findings of the study demonstrated that carbon stock accumulation was statistically significant between the mean of soil organic carbon agroforestry land use. Agroforestry systems, in general, contribute significantly more to smallholder livelihoods, as well as the socioeconomic system, in the face of climate change concerns. Incorporating smallholders into an agroforestry system for long-term livelihood sustainability requires support in the form of resources, training, and research. In the face of climate change threats, local, regional, and national governments, as well as financial institutions and other agricultural credit providers, must support smallholders.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference46 articles.
1. Adebisi-Adelani, O. & Oyesola O.B. (2014). Farmers’ perceptions of the effect of climate change on tomato production in Nigeria. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 20(4), 366–373. DOI: 10.1080/19315260.2013.813890. 2. Akinnifesi, F.K., Chirwa, P.W., Ajayi, O.C., Sileshi, G., Matakala, P., Kwesiga, F.R., Harawa, H. & Makumba W. (2008). Contributions of agroforestry research to livelihood of smallholder farmers in southern Africa: 1. taking stock of the adaptation, adoption and impact of fertilizer tree options. Agric. J., 3(1), 58–75. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/ETH 3. Al-Shammary, A.A.G., Kouzani, A.Z., Kaynak, A., Khoo, S.Y., Norton, M. & Gates W. (2018). Soil bulk density estimation methods: a review. Pedo-sphere, 28(4), 581‒596. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(18)60034-7. 4. Bezu, T., Woldetsadik, K. & Tana T. (2015). Production scenarios of mango (Mangifera indica L.) in Harari regional state, eastern Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 3(4), 59–63. DOI: 10.4314/star. v3i4.8. 5. Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. DOI: 10.1177/146879410605887.
|
|