How Could Semantic Processing and Other NLP Tools Improve Online Legal Databases?

Author:

Vági Renátó1

Affiliation:

1. 1 MONTANA Knowledge Management Ltd . Budapest , Hungary , Doctoral School of Law, Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest , Hungary

Abstract

Abstract The spread of online databases and the increasingly sophisticated search solutions in the past 10–15 years have opened up many new opportunities for lawyers to find relevant documents. However, it is still a common problem that the various legal databases and legal search engines face an information crisis. Legal database providers use various information extraction solutions, especially named entity recognition (NER), to mitigate this problem. These solutions can improve the relevance of the lists of results. Their limitation, however, is that they can only extract and create searchable metadata entities if the latter have a well-defined location or regularity in the text. Therefore, the next era of search support for legal databases is semantic processing. Semantic processing solutions are fundamentally different from information extraction and NER because they do not only extract and make visible and/or searchable the specific information element contained in the text but allow for the analytical analysis of the text as a whole. In addition, in many cases, legal database developments using machine learning can be a significant burden on a company, as it is not always known what kind of an AI solution is needed, and how the providers could compare the different solutions. Legal database providers need to customize processing their documents and texts in the most optimal way possible, considering all their legal, linguistic, statistical, or other characteristics. This is where text processing pipelines can help. So, the article reviews the two main natural language processing (NLP) solutions which can help legal database providers to increase the value of legal data within legal databases. The article then shows the importance of text-processing pipelines and frameworks in the era of digitized documents and presents the digital-twin-distiller.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History,Law

Reference34 articles.

1. Ashley, K. D. (2019), Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age, Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press.

2. Bing, J. (2010), ‘Let there be LITE: A Brief History of Legal Information Retrieval,’ European Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1.

3. Blei, D. M.; Ngy, A. Y. & Jordan, M. I. (2003), ‘Latent Dirichlet allocation,’ Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, pp. 993–1022.

4. Bloomberg Law (2020), Litigators Sound Off on Their Most Time-Consuming Task, 7 February. Retrieved from https://pro.bloomberglaw.com/brief/litigators-sound-off-on-their-most-time-consuming-task/ [accessed Oct 2023]

5. Bommarito II, M. J.; Katz, D. M. & Detterman, E. M. (2021), ‘LexNLP: Natural Language Processing and Information Extraction for Legal and Regulatory Texts,’ in Research Handbook on Big Data Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 216–227. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972826.00017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3