Sexual Violence: Comparative Overview of German and Georgian Legal Perspectives

Author:

Kherkheulidze Irine1

Affiliation:

1. School of Law , Caucasus University Paata Saakadze 1 Tbilisi 0102 , Georgia

Abstract

Abstract The issue of sexual violence that this article was tasked to deal with is neither new nor devoid of a regulating legislative framework. Moreover, a number of scientists from diff erent countries and institutions of the world have devoted their works to the topic under discussion, which has repeatedly been subjected to discussions in the European Court of Human Rights, International Criminal Court, and ad hoc tribunals. However, this article aspires to analyze the normative framework for the regulation of sexual violence in line with Article 36 of the Istanbul Convention in Germany and Georgia after the ratifi cation of the Convention in the last decade. The main focus of the study is the contentious interpretation of consent in sexual off ences. Due to the inevitable legislation reforms concerning sexual violence, this academic work examines new trends on regulating this issue in Western countries, especially in Germany, considering the historical ties of Georgian Criminal Code to German law. The article discusses sexual violence in general, providing a brief review of sexual violence legislation, where it is mainly presented by considering the international legal framework. Sexual violence and other sexual off ences according to Georgian and German criminal codes are presented in general terms and in a comparative manner. The article also explains rape in the light of its re-conceptualization, encompassing an analysis on sexual violence, including rape, especially in relation to consent. This, in turn, can prompt amendments to Georgian Criminal Code on the related issue, which currently does not comply with the standards on interpreting sexual violence, established by the Istanbul Convention and other important related international acts.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference30 articles.

1. Bhat, P. I. (2015), ‘Comparative Method of Legal Research: Nature, Process and Potentiality,’ Journal of the Indian Law Institute, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 147–173. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44782499 [accessed 5 Feb 2024]

2. Bohlander, M. (2009), Principles of German Criminal Law, Oxford & Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.

3. Criminal Code of Georgia (CCG), Law of Georgia, LHG 41(48), 13.8.1999.

4. Criminal Code of Germany (StGB) – Strafgesetzbuch, Criminal Code in the version published on 13 November 1998 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 3322), as last amended by Article 2 of the Act of 22 November 2021 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 4906).

5. Cusack, S. & Timmer, A. S. H. (2011), ‘Gender Stereotyping in Rape Cases: The CEDAW Committee’s Decision in Vertido v. The Philippines,’ Human Rights Law Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngr004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3