Affiliation:
1. Jerzy Eisenberg-Guyot and Megan C. Finsaas are with the Department of Epidemiology and Seth J. Prins is with the Departments of Epidemiology and Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Abstract
Objectives. To estimate social class inequities in US mortality using a relational measure based on power over productive property and workers’ labor. Methods. We used nationally representative 1986–2018 National Health Interview Survey data with mortality follow-up through December 31, 2019 (n = 911 850). First, using business-ownership, occupational, and employment-status data, we classified respondents as incorporated business owners (IBOs), unincorporated business owners (UBOs), managers, workers, or not in the labor force (NLFs). Next, using inverse-probability-weighted survival curves, we estimated class mortality inequities overall, after subdividing workers by employment status and occupation, and by period, gender, race/ethnicity, and education. Results. UBOs, workers, and NLFs had, respectively, 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] = −8.1, −4.6), 6.6 (95% CI = −8.1, −5.0), and 19.4 (95% CI = −21.0, −17.7) per 100 lower 34-year survival rates than IBOs. Mortality risk was especially high for unemployed, blue-collar, and service workers. Inequities increased over time and were greater among male, racially minoritized, and less-educated respondents. Conclusions. We estimated considerable mortality inequities by class, gender, and race/ethnicity. We also estimated that class mortality inequities are increasing, threatening population health. Public Health Implications. Addressing class inequities likely requires structural, worker-empowering interventions. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(6):637–646. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307227 )
Publisher
American Public Health Association
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health