Author:
Savelyev I. M.,Kaygorodov M. Y.,Kozhedub Y. S.,Tupitsyn I. I.,Shabaev V. M.
Abstract
The binding-energy differences for $$^{{163}}{\text{H}}{{{\text{o}}}^{{q + }}}$$ and $$^{{163}}{\text{D}}{{{\text{y}}}^{{q + }}}$$ ions with ionization degrees $$q = 38$$, 39, and 40 are calculated. The calculations are performed using the large-scale relativistic configuration-interaction and relativistic coupled-clusters methods. The contributions from quantum-electrodynamics, nuclear-recoil, and frequency-dependent Breit-interaction effects are taken into account. The final uncertainty does not exceed 1 eV. Combining the obtained results with the binding-energy difference for neutral atoms calculated in [I.M. Savelyev, M.Y. Kaygorodov, Y.S. Kozhedub, I.I. Tupitsyn, and V.M. Shabaev, Phys. Rev. A 105, 012806 (2022)], we get the secondary differences of the ion–atom binding energies. These values can be used to evaluate the amount of energy released in the electron capture process in $$^{{163}}{\text{Ho}}$$ atom (the Q value), provided mass differences of highly charged ions $$^{{163}}{\text{H}}{{{\text{o}}}^{{q + }}}$$ and $$^{{163}}{\text{D}}{{{\text{y}}}^{{q + }}}$$ is known from experiment. The Q value is required by experiments on the determination of the absolute scale of the electron neutrino mass by studying the beta-decay process.
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Reference29 articles.
1. K. Zuber, Neutrino Physics, Series in High Energy Physics, Cosmology, and Gravitation, 3rd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2020).
2. S. Vagnozzi, E. Giusarma, O. Mena, K. Freese, M. Gerbino, S. Ho, and M. Lattanzi, Phys. Rev. D 96, 123503 (2017).
3. M. M. Ivanov, M. Simonovic, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083504 (2020).
4. R. L. Workman, V. D. Burkert, V. Crede, et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
5. M. Aker, A. Beglarian, J. Behrens, et al. (KATRIN Collab.), Nat. Phys. 18, 160 (2022).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献