Affiliation:
1. KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, VETERİNER FAKÜLTESİ
2. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi
Abstract
The domesticated species of goats, scientifically known as Capra hircus, have played a significant role in several aspects of human existence over the course of history. These animals have made notable contributions to both individual animal breeding practices and the overall national economy. Their unique meat and milk production, along with their ease of cultivation, distinguish them as noteworthy entities. Goat milk is widely favored by customers due to its hypoallergenic features, low lactose levels, and rich composition. As a result, goat breeding has been prevalent in our country and globally for milk production in animal husbandry. In accordance with the purpose of achieving a high-quality final product, which constitutes a primary goal of animal husbandry, it is important to possess knowledge on certain attributes relating to the animal under cultivation. The aforementioned characteristics pertain to the anatomical composition of the udder and the physiological processes involved in breastfeeding in goats. Lactation physiology encompasses three key processes: mammogenesis, lactogenesis, and galactopoiesis. Mammogenesis refers to the formation of the udder, while lactogenesis involves the secretion of milk. Galactopoiesis, on the other hand, pertains to the maintenance of continuous milk supply. This review will examine the reproductive cycle, physical structure, and developmental aspects of the udder, as well as the many stages of lactation physiology in goats.
Publisher
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Yozgat Bozok University
Reference65 articles.
1. 1. Hatziminaoglou, Y. and J. Boyazoglu, The goat in ancient civilisations: from the Fertile Crescent to the Aegean Sea. Small Ruminant Research, 2004. 51(2): p. 123-129.
2. 2. Haenlein, G., About the evolution of goat and sheep milk production. Small ruminant research, 2007. 68(1-2): p. 3-6.
3. 3. FAO, Production Yearbook 2002 Food Agric. Organisation. 2003: UN, Rome, Italy.
4. 4. Pollott, G. and R.T. Wilson, Sheep and goats for diverse products and profits. FAO Diversification booklet, 2009(9).
5. 5. De Vries, J., Goats for the poor: Some keys to successful promotion of goat production among the poor. Small Ruminant Research, 2008. 77(2-3): p. 221-224.