Time-Dependent Reasons for Peritoneal Dialysis Technique Failure and Mortality

Author:

Kolesnyk Inna1,Dekker Friedo W.2,Boeschoten Elisabeth W.3,Krediet Raymond T.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam; Naarden, The Netherlands

2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden;

3. Hans Mak Institute, Naarden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background Peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique failure is high compared to hemodialysis (HD). There is a lack of data on the impact of duration of PD treatment on technique survival and on whether there is a difference in risk factors with respect to early and late failure. The aim of this study was to clarify these issues by performing a time-dependent analysis of PD technique and patient survival in a large cohort of incident PD patients. Methods We analyzed 709 incident PD patients participating in the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD), who started their treatment between 1997 and 2007. We compared technique and patient survival on PD in 4 periods of follow-up: within the first 3 months, and after 3 – 12 months, 12 – 24 months, and 24 – 36 months of treatment. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze survival on PD and technique failure. Risk factors were also identified by comparing patients that were transferred to HD with those that remained on PD. Incidence rates for every cause of dropout for each period of follow-up were calculated to establish their trends with respect to PD treatment duration. Results There was a significant increase in transplantation rate after the first year of treatment. The rate of switching to HD was highest during the first 3 months and decreased afterward. One-, 2- and 3-year technique survival was 87%, 76%, and 66%, respectively. Age, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease appeared to be risk factors for death on PD or switch to HD: a 1-year increase in age was associated with a relative risk (RR) of PD failure of 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.003 – 1.06]; for diabetes, RR of stopping PD after 3 months of treatment increased from 1.8 (95% CI 1.1 – 3) during the first year to 2.2 (95% CI 1.3 – 4) after the second year; cardiovascular disease had a major impact in the earliest period (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2 – 5) and had a stable influence further on (RR 2, 95% CI 1.1 – 3.5). Loss of 1 mL/minute residual glomerular filtration rate (rGFR) appeared to be a significant predictor of PD failure after 3 months of treatment, but within the first 2 years, RR was 1.1 (95% CI 1.04 – 1.25). Conclusions In The Netherlands, transplantation is a main reason to stop PD treatment. The incidence of PD technique failure is at its highest during the earliest months after treatment initiation and decreases later due to fewer catheter and abdominal complications as well as less influence of psychosocial factors. Risk factors for PD discontinuation are those responsible for patient survival: age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and rGFR.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,General Medicine

Cited by 145 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Integrated home dialysis model: facilitating home-to-home transition;Clinical Kidney Journal;2024-05-01

2. Exploring clinical practice guidelines in PD: When to guide and when to draw the line;Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis;2024-04-21

3. Risk factors and outcomes in patients who switched from peritoneal dialysis to physician-oriented or patient-oriented kidney replacement therapy;Renal Failure;2024-04-11

4. The Peritoneal Dialysis Surprise Question and Technique Survival: Are you surprised?;Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis;2024-01

5. Of Peritoneal Dialysis Access and Home Dialysis Accessibility;Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2023-12-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3