The Effects of Biocompatible Compared with Standard Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions on Peritonitis Microbiology, Treatment, and Outcomes: The Balanz Trial

Author:

,Johnson David W.12,Brown Fiona G.3,Clarke Margaret4,Boudville Neil5,Elias Tony J.6,Foo Marjorie W.Y.7,Jones Bernard8,Kulkarni Hemant9,Langham Robyn1011,Ranganathan Dwarakanathan212,Schollum John13,Suranyi Michael G.14,Tan Seng H.151617,Voss David18

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nephrology,

2. Princess Alexandra Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

3. Department of Nephrology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

4. Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Fresenius Medical Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

5. Sydney, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

6. University of Western Australia, Perth, and Central Northern Adelaide and Renal Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

7. Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

8. John Hunter Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

9. Newcastle, Fremantle Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

10. Fremantle, St. Vincent's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

11. Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Brisbane, Australia

12. Melbourne, and Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

13. Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand

14. Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia

15. Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore

16. Changi General Hospital, Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore

17. S.H. Tan Kidney and Medical Clinic, Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore

18. Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Abstract

Background A multicenter, multi-country randomized controlled trial (the balANZ study) recently reported that peritonitis rates significantly improved with the use of neutral-pH peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions low in glucose degradation products (“biocompatible”) compared with standard solutions. The present paper reports a secondary outcome analysis of the balANZ trial with respect to peritonitis microbiology, treatment, and outcomes. Methods Adult incident PD patients with residual renal function were randomized to receive either biocompatible or conventional (control) PD solutions for 2 years. Results The safety population analysis for peritonitis included 91 patients in each group. The unadjusted geometric mean peritonitis rates in those groups were 0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22 to 0.41] episodes per patient–year for the biocompatible group and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.39 to 0.62) episodes per patient–year for the control group [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.90; p = 0.01]. When specific causative organisms were examined, the rates of culture-negative, gram-positive, gram-negative, and polymicrobial peritonitis episodes were not significantly different between the biocompatible and control groups, although the biocompatible group did experience a significantly lower rate of non-pseudomonal gram-negative peritonitis (IRR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.92; p = 0.03). Initial empiric antibiotic regimens were comparable between the groups. Biocompatible fluid use did not significantly reduce the risk of peritonitis-associated hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.34), but did result in a shorter median duration of peritonitis-associated hospitalization (6 days vs 11 days, p = 0.05). Peritonitis severity was more likely to be rated as mild in the biocompatible group (37% vs 10%, p = 0.001). Overall peritonitis-associated technique failures and peritonitis-related deaths were comparable in the two groups. Conclusions Biocompatible PD fluid use was associated with a broad reduction in gram-positive, gram-negative, and culture-negative peritonitis that reached statistical significance for non-pseudomonal gram-negative organisms. Peritonitis hospitalization duration was shorter, and peritonitis severity was more commonly rated as mild in patients receiving biocompatible PD fluids, although other peritonitis outcomes were comparable between the groups.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,General Medicine

Cited by 63 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3