Combined radiotherapy and hormone therapy in unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer

Author:

Makarova K. S.1ORCID,Gumenetskaya Yu. V.1ORCID,Biryukov V. A.1ORCID,Rodina T. A.1ORCID,Galitsyna A. B.2,Shchukina E. O.1ORCID,Karyakin O. B.1ORCID,Ivanov S. A.3ORCID,Kaprin A. D.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

2. Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power Engineering — branch of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)

3. A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

4. Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Abstract

Background. Currently, the group of intermediate risk prostate cancer (PC) includes 2 subgroups - favorable and unfavorable intermediate risk according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) classification. The optimal scope of therapy is not defined for the unfavorable intermediate risk subgroup. In particular, the need for and duration of hormone therapy (HT) during combined radiotherapy (CRT) have not yet been determined.Aim. To perform a comparative analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of CRT in patients with unfavorable intermediate risk treated with and without HT.Materials and methods. Eighty-four (84) patients with unfavorable intermediate risk PC were treated with CRT at the clinic of the A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center between May 2016 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: external beam radiation therapy + brachytherapy (n = 40) and external beam radiation therapy + brachytherapy + HT (n = 44). Conformal external beam radiation therapy was delivered with conventional fractionation to a total dose of 44-46 Gy and the 192Ir high-dose rate brachytherapy was delivered with a single fraction of 15 Gy. Median duration of HT consisting of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was 6 months. Median age was 65.2 years (range: 49-80 years). Median follow-up was 58.1 months (range: 18.6-83.7 months).Results. With a median follow-up of 4.8 years, progression-free survival was 95 % and 97.6 % in the external beam radiation therapy + brachytherapy group and external beam radiation therapy + brachytherapy + HT group, respectively (p = 0.578). The break between treatment stages of more than 28 days was associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of PC recurrence (p = 0.007). Overall survival for the external beam radiation therapy + brachytherapy group versus external beam radiation therapy + brachytherapy + HT group was 97.5 and 93.2 % (p = 0.376), respectively.Late genitourinary toxicity was grade I in 8 (9.5 %) patients and grade II in 1 (1.2 %) patient. Urethral stricture developed in 3 (3.6 %) patients. Late gastrointestinal toxicity was grade I in 7 (8.3 %) patients and grade II in 1 (1.2 %) patient. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of late complications between groups with and without HT. There was a statistically significant (p = 0.049) effect of prostate volume on the incidence of late radiation proctitis.Conclusion. There were no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with unfavorable intermediate risk PC who received external beam radiation therapy + brachytherapy with or without HT. The incidence and severity of adverse events were acceptable and allowed patients with PC to maintain high quality of life.

Publisher

Publishing House ABV Press

Subject

Urology,Nephrology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,Surgery

Reference21 articles.

1. State of oncological care in Russia in 2021. Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.O. Shachzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena - filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2022. 239 p. (In Russ.).

2. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2021 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: A. D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.O. Shachzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena - filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2022. 252 p. (In Russ.).

3. Fletcher S.A., Landenberg N., Cole A.P. et al. Contemporary national trends in prostate cancer risk profile at diagnosis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020;23(1):81-7. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-019-0157-y

4. NCCN Guidelines, Version 1.2023. Prostate cancer. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf.

5. Zumsteg Z.S., Spratt D.E., Pei I. et al. A new risk classification system for therapeutic decision making with intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated external-beam radiation therapy. Eur Urol 2013;64(6):895-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.033

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3