Tech giants versus nation states: prospects for digital multipolarity

Author:

Zhukov D.1

Affiliation:

1. Tambov State University

Abstract

This paper presents a political and predictive study of relationship between nation states and large corporations (tech giants) in relation to socially relevant online platforms (SROP). The key question of the article: will the current dominance of global SROP increase, or will they be fragmented (that is the separation of relatively isolated national or meta-regional segments) under the influence of nation states’ intention to protect their sovereignty. A methodological framework includes the following tools: (1) a discourse analysis of the research literature, (2) constructing predictive scenarios based on implicit models revealed in reviewed publications. Despite the search for some kind of control that nation states can have over global SROP (specifically, in India and Turkey), the Chinese model of total fragmentation of SROP is gaining support. Global SROP, as a manifestation of non-public and illegitimate power of tech giants, have transformed the landscape of contemporary international relations. A systemic virtualization of politics reduces the capacity of nation states to survive in a medium where social relations, identity, political behavior, and historical memory are formed and destructed through the intangible impact of global actors and unpredictable virtual cataclysms. The author draws a conclusion that the presumption of multipolarity of the world makes the fragmentation of SROP the only positive scenario. The intention of some governments to make do with only regulating the global tech giants can be interpreted as an illusion that threatens the survival of nation states.

Publisher

Infra-M Academic Publishing House

Reference22 articles.

1. Бак П. Как работает природа: теория самоорганизованной критичности. − Москва: УРСС, 2014. − 276 c., Bak P. Kak rabotayet priroda: teoriya samoorganizovannoy kritichnosti [How Nature Works: The Theory of Self-Organized Criticality]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2014, 276 p. (In Russian).

2. Барабаш Н.С., Жуков Д.С., Кунавин К.С., Лямин С.К. Протесты на улицах и в сетях: новые исследовательские методы на основе теории самоорганизованной критичности // Инноватика и экспертиза: научные труды. − 2017. − № 1 (22). − С. 54-66. URL: http://inno-exp.ru/archive/22/ (дата обращения: 09.06.2021)., Barabash N.S., Zhukov D.S., Kunavin K.S., Lyamin S.K. Protests on the streets and in networks: new research methods based on the theory of self-organized criticality, Innovatika i ekspertiza [Innovation and Expertise]. 2017, I. 1(22), pp. 54-66. (In Russian).

3. Володенков С.В., Федорченко С.Н. Цифровые стигматы как инструмент манипуляции массовым сознанием в условиях современного государства и общества // Социологические исследования. − 2018. − № 11(415). − С. 117-123. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250002791-3., Volodenkov S., Fedorchenko S. Digital stigmata as a tool of manipulating mass consciousness in the conditions of modern state and society, Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Research]. 2018, I. 11(415), pp. 117-123. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250002791-3. (In Russian).

4. Жуков Д.С. Самоорганизованная критичность в сетевых протестно-революционных движениях: новые данные // Социально-гуманитарные знания. − 2018. − № 8. − С. 272-278., Zhukov D.S. Self-organized criticality in online protests and revolutions: New data, Sotsial'no-gumanitarnyye znaniya [Social and humanitarian knowledge]. 2018, I. 8, pp. 272-278. (In Russian).

5. Жуков Д.С., Лямин С.К. Революции в Сети: приложение теории самоорганизованной критичности к изучению протестных движений // Историческая информатика. − 2017. − № 4. − С.11-43. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/istinf/article_24559.html (дата обращения: 09.06.2021)., Zhukov D.S., Lyamin S.K. Revolutions on the Web: the application of the theory of self-organized criticality to the study of protest movements, Istoricheskaya informatika [Historical informatics]. 2017, I. 4, pp. 11-43. Available at: http://e-notabene.ru/istinf/article_24559.html (Accessed: 09.06.2021). (In Russian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3