Vertical tumor-positive resection margins and the risk of residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection of Barrett’s neoplasia: a nationwide cohort with pathology reassessment

Author:

van Tilburg Laurelle1ORCID,Verheij Eva P. D.2,van de Ven Steffi E. M.1ORCID,van Munster Sanne N.2ORCID,Weusten Bas L. A. M.,Herrero Lorenza Alvarez3,Nagengast Wouter B.4,Schoon Erik J.,Alkhalaf Alaa5,Bergman Jacques J. G. H. M.2,Pouw Roos E.2,Oudijk Lindsey6,Meijer Sybren L.7ORCID,Jansen Marnix,Doukas Michail6,Koch Arjun D.1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

4. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

5. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands

6. Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

7. Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

Background This study evaluated the proportion of patients with residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection (ER) for Barrett’s neoplasia with confirmed tumor-positive vertical resection margin (R1v). Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing ER for Barrett’s neoplasia with histologically documented R1v since 2008 in the Dutch Barrett Expert Centers. We defined R1v as cancer cells touching vertical resection margins and Rx as nonassessable margins. Reassessment of R1v specimens was performed by experienced pathologists until consensus was reached regarding vertical margins. Results 101/110 included patients had macroscopically complete resections (17 T1a, 84 T1b), and 99/101 (98%) ER specimens were histologically reassessed, with R1v confirmed in 74 patients (75%), Rx in 16%, and R0 in 9%. Presence/absence of residual neoplasia could be assessed in 66/74 patients during endoscopic reassessment (52) and/or in the surgical resection specimen (14), and 33/66 (50%) had residual neoplasia. Residual neoplasia detected during endoscopy was always endoscopically visible and biopsies from a normal-appearing ER scar did not detect additional neoplasia. Of 25 patients who underwent endoscopic follow-up (median 37 months [interquartile range 12–50]), 4 developed local recurrence (16.0%), all detected as visible abnormalities. Conclusions After ER with R1v, 50% of patients had no residual neoplasia. Histological evaluation of ER margins appears challenging, as in this study 75% of documented R1v cases were confirmed during reassessment. Endoscopic reassessment 8–12 weeks after ER seems to accurately detect residual neoplasia and can help to determine the most appropriate strategy for patients with R1v.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3