LI-RADS in the year 2020 – Are you already using it or still considering?

Author:

Ringe Kristina Imeen1,Gut Anne2,Grenacher Lars3,Juchems Markus4,Kukuk Guido5,Wessling Johannes6,Schreyer Andreas G.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital Brandenburg, Germany

3. Imaging and Prevention Center, Conradia Radiology Munich, Germany

4. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital Konstanz, Germany

5. Department of Radiology, Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland

6. Department of Radiology, Clemenshospital GmbH Münster, Germany

7. Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a. d. Havel, Germany

Abstract

Purpose The working group for gastrointestinal and abdominal imaging within the German Radiological Society performed a nationwide online survey in order to assess the current status regarding the awareness and application of LI-RADS, a classification for evaluation of liver lesions in patients at risk. Materials and Methods Using the website www.deutsches-krankenhausverzeichnis.de a list of hospitals was generated meeting the criteria internal medicine, gastroenterology, general and visceral surgery and radiology (n = 391). Randomly, 102 department directors were contacted, and asked to name one consultant and one resident from their department in order to participate in the survey. 177 potential participants were invited to fill out an approximately 10-minute online survey in the form of 17 questions regarding the awareness and application of LI-RADS. The results of the survey were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. Results 77 participants were registered, which corresponds to a response rate of 43.5 %. 47 % of all participants were radiologists, 30 % surgeons and 23 % internal doctors/gastroenterologists, respectively, many with more than 13 years of professional experience (37.2 %). The majority of participants worked in a hospital with a focus (37.2 %) or a university hospital (29.1 %). Even though the majority of participants knows about or has heard of LI-RADS (73.2 %), only a minority uses the classification themselves (26 %) or within the context of tumor boards (19.2 %). Conclusion The results of our survey demonstrate that LI-RADS is relatively known in Germany, the application however quite sparse. This is in contrast to the general desire and endeavor for more standardized reporting in radiology. Key points Citation Format

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Reference20 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. LI-RADS Made Easy;RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren;2023-02-01

2. Bildgebung in der zirrhotischen Leber – warum, wie und was ist LI-RADS?;Radiologie up2date;2022-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3