Linking Electronic Health Record and Trauma Registry Data: Assessing the Value of Probabilistic Linkage

Author:

Durojaiye Ashimiyu12,Puett Lisa3,Levin Scott4,Toerper Matthew5,McGeorge Nicolette1,Webster Kristen1,Deol Gurmehar12,Kharrazi Hadi2,Lehmann Harold2,Gurses Ayse126

Affiliation:

1. Center for Health Care Human Factors, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

2. Division of Health Sciences Informatics, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

3. Department of Pediatric Nursing, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

4. Department of Emergency Medicine and Operations Integration, Whiting School of Engineering, Systems Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

5. Department of Emergency Medicine and Operations Integration, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

6. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Abstract

Background Electronic health record (EHR) systems contain large volumes of novel heterogeneous data that can be linked to trauma registry data to enable innovative research not possible with either data source alone. Objective This article describes an approach for linking electronically extracted EHR data to trauma registry data at the institutional level and assesses the value of probabilistic linkage. Methods Encounter data were independently obtained from the EHR data warehouse (n = 1,632) and the pediatric trauma registry (n = 1,829) at a Level I pediatric trauma center. Deterministic linkage was attempted using nine different combinations of medical record number (MRN), encounter identity (ID) (visit ID), age, gender, and emergency department (ED) arrival date. True matches from the best performing variable combination were used to create a gold standard, which was used to evaluate the performance of each variable combination, and to train a probabilistic algorithm that was separately used to link records unmatched by deterministic linkage and the entire cohort. Additional records that matched probabilistically were investigated via chart review and compared against records that matched deterministically. Results Deterministic linkage with exact matching on any three of MRN, encounter ID, age, gender, and ED arrival date gave the best yield of 1,276 true matches while an additional probabilistic linkage step following deterministic linkage yielded 110 true matches. These records contained a significantly higher number of boys compared to records that matched deterministically and etiology was attributable to mismatch between MRNs in the two data sets. Probabilistic linkage of the entire cohort yielded 1,363 true matches. Conclusion The combination of deterministic and an additional probabilistic method represents a robust approach for linking EHR data to trauma registry data. This approach may be generalizable to studies involving other registries and databases.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3