Impact of Tourniquet Strategy on Perioperative Results of Modern TKA

Author:

Rames Richard D.1,Haynes Jacob1,Hellman Michael1,Barrack Toby1,Barrack Robert1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri

Abstract

AbstractRecent changes in perioperative management of total knee patients including tranexamic acid, multimodal pain management, and periarticular injection make previous data on tourniquet use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) less relevant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of tourniquet use on short-term postoperative outcomes in the era of modern TKA. Our institutional database was utilized to retrospectively identify three cohorts (long, short, and no tourniquet) of consecutive patients after unilateral TKA with a single surgeon. These three groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's tests. Primary endpoints being hemoglobin index (difference in preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin), inpatient narcotic use, surgical time, length of hospital stay (total hours and % day1 discharges), and distance ambulated prior to discharge. The no-tourniquet group used significantly less narcotic than the short-tourniquet (2.4 vs. 2.9 morphine equivalent/hour, p = 0.004) and long-tourniquet groups (2.4 vs. 3.4 morphine equivalents/hour, p < 0.001). The no-tourniquet group ambulated significantly further than patients in the short (108 vs. 57 feet, p < 0.001) and long (108 vs. 76 feet, p < 0.001) groups. Finally, the no-tourniquet group had significantly shorter duration of hospitalization than the long-tourniquet group in both hours in the hospital (35 vs. 57 hours, p < 0.001) and % postoperative day 1 discharge (57 vs. 12%, p < 0.001). TKA without the use of a tourniquet is associated with less narcotic consumption and increased distance ambulated prior to discharge compared with cohorts of patients utilizing tourniquet for a short or long duration.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3