Telehealth and the COVID-19 Pandemic: International Perspectives and a Health Systems Framework for Telehealth Implementation to Support Critical Response

Author:

Basu Arindam1,Kuziemsky Craig2,de Araújo Novaes Magdala3,Kleber Araujo4,Sales Fernando5,Al-Shorbaji Najeeb6,Flórez-Arango José F.7,Gogia Shashi B.8,Ho Kendall9,Hunter Inga10,Iyengar Sriram11,John Oommen12,John Sheila13,Kulatunga Gumindu1415,Rajput Vije Kumar16,Ranatunga Prasad1415,Udayasankaran Jai Ganesh17

Affiliation:

1. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

2. MacEwan University, Edmonton, Canada

3. Medical Sciences Center, Telehealth Center, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

4. Telehealth Center (NUTES), Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

5. Technology and Geosciences Center, Telehealth Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

6. eHealth Development Association of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

7. Texas A & M University, College Station, United States of America

8. Society for Administration of Telemedicine and Healthcare Informatics, New Delhi, India

9. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

10. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

11. University of Arizona, Phoenix, United States of America

12. George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

13. Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India

14. Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka

15. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

16. Keele University, Staffordshire, UK

17. Sri Sathya Sai Central Trust, Puttaparthi, India

Abstract

Objectives: Telehealth implementation is a complex systems-based endeavour. This paper compares telehealth responses to (COrona VIrus Disease 2019) COVID-19 across ten countries to identify lessons learned about the complexity of telehealth during critical response such as in response to a global pandemic. Our overall objective is to develop a health systems-based framework for telehealth implementation to support critical response. Methods: We sought responses from the members of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Telehealth Working Group (WG) on their practices and perception of telehealth practices during the times of COVID-19 pandemic in their respective countries. We then analysed their responses to identify six emerging themes that we mapped to the World Health Organization (WHO) model of health systems. Results: Our analysis identified six emergent themes. (1) Government, legal or regulatory aspects of telehealth; (2) Increase in telehealth capacity and delivery; (3) Regulated and unregulated telehealth; (4) Changes in the uptake and perception of telemedicine; (5) Public engagement in telehealth responses to COVID-19; and (6) Implications for training and education. We discuss these themes and then use them to develop a systems framework for telehealth support in critical response. Conclusion: COVID-19 has introduced new challenges for telehealth support in times of critical response. Our themes and systems framework extend the WHO systems model and highlight that telemedicine usage in response to the COVID-19 pandemic is complex and multidimensional. Our systems-based framework provides guidance for telehealth implementation as part of health systems response to a global pandemic such as COVID-19.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3