A prospective study on quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): trend in Italy from the REQUEST study

Author:

Donato Giulio1,Occhipinti Pietro1,Correale Loredana1,Spadaccini Marco23,Repici Alessandro23,Anderloni Andrea2,Fugazza Alessandro2,Mosca Piergiorgio4,Tringali Andrea56,Costamagna Guido56,Bulajic Milutin78,de Pretis Giovanni9,Gabbrielli Armando10,Di Matteo Francesco Maria11,Faggiani Roberto12,Ayoubi Mohammad13,De Luca Luca14,Cantù Paolo15,Blois Matteo16,Dell’Amico Iginio17,Maurano Attilio18,Savarese Maria Flavia19,Manes Giampiero20,Ferraro Raffaella21,Barberis Mauro22,Hassan Cesare23,

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Oncological and Specialty Medicine, Ospedale “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy

2. Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy

3. Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy

4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology & Transplantation, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy

5. Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy

6. Centre for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy

7. Gastroenterology and GI Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy

8. Mater Olbia Hospital-Qatar Foundation Endowment & Gemelli Foundation, Gastroenterology and GI Endoscopy Unit, Olbia (OT), Italy

9. Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale S. Chiara, Trento, Italy

10. Digestive Endoscopy Unit, AOUI Verona, Italy

11. Operative Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma

12. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Oncological and Specialty Medicine, S. Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy

13. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Gradenigo-Humanitas, Torino, Italy

14. Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, A.O. Ospedale Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy

15. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

16. Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Nord-Ovest, Livorno, Italy

17. Endoscopy Unit, Apuane Hospital, Massa-Carrara, Italy

18. Operative Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Salerno, Italy

19. Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, General Hospital, Sanremo (IM), Italy

20. Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, ASST Rhodense Garbagnate Milanese, Milano, Italy

21. Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale S. Andrea, ASL VC, Vercelli, Italy

22. Gastroenterology Unit, Policlinico di Monza, Monza (MB), Italy

23. Department of Gastroenterology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Roma, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex procedure with a relatively high rate of adverse events. Data on training of operators and fulfillment of quality indicators in Italy are scarce. The goal of this study was to assess the overall quality of ERCP in Italy compared to international standards. Patients and methods This was a prospective, observational study from different Italian centers performing ERCP. Operators answered a questionnaire, then recorded data on ERCPs over a 1-to 3-month period. Results Nineteen Italian centers participated in the study. The most common concern of operators about training was the lack of structured programs. Seven/19 centers routinely used conscious sedation for ERCP. Forty-one experienced operators and 21 trainees performed 766 ERCPs: a successful deep biliary cannulation in native-papilla patients was achieved in 95.1 % of cases; the post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) rate was 5.4 % in native-papilla patients; cholangitis rate was 1.0 %; bleeding and perforation occurred in 2.7 % and 0.4 % of the patients, respectively. Conclusions This study revealed that, overall, ERCP is performed in the participating Italian centers meeting good quality standards, but structured training and sedation practice are still subpar. The bleeding and perforation rate slightly exceeded the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy indicator targets but they are comparable to the reported rates from other international surveys.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3