Rates of Cesarean Conversion and Associated Predictors and Outcomes in Planned Vaginal Twin Deliveries

Author:

Mei Jenny Y.1ORCID,Muñoz Hector E.2,Kim Jessica S.3,Szlachta-McGinn Alec1,Blat Cinthia3,Rao Rashmi1,Han Christina S.1ORCID,Irani Roxanna A.4,Afshar Yalda1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, California

2. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California

3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California

4. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California

Abstract

Objective Twin vaginal deliveries (VDs) are often performed in the operating room (OR) given the risk of conversion to cesarean delivery (CD) for the aftercoming twin. We aim to investigate the rates of conversion to CD for planned twin VDs and identify predictors and outcomes of conversion. Study Design A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent a planned twin VD at two large academic medical centers over 4 years. Demographic and outcome data were chart abstracted. Various statistical tests were used to evaluate the influence of perinatal variables on mode of delivery and identify possible predictors of conversion. Results Eight hundred and eighty-five twin deliveries were identified, of which 725 (81.9%) were possible candidates for VD. Of those, 237 (32.7%) underwent successful VD of twin A. Ninety-five (40.1%) had a nonvertex second twin at time of delivery. Conversion to CD occurred in 10 planned VDs (4.2%). Conversions were higher with spontaneous labor (relative risk [RR]: 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–2.7; p = 0.003), and having an intertwin delivery interval greater than 60 minutes (RR: 5.1; 95% CI: 2.5–10.8; p < 0.001). Nonvertex presentation of twin B, type of delivery provider, or years out in practice of delivery provider were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between VD and conversion groups. There was a significant association between use of forceps for twin B and successful VD (p = 0.02), with 84.6% in the setting of a nonvertex twin B. Conclusion Successful VD was achieved in planned VD of twins in 95.8% of cases, and there were no significant differences in maternal and fetal outcomes between successful VD and conversion to CD for twin B. With the optimal clinical scenario and shared decision-making, performing vaginal twin deliveries in labor and delivery rooms should be discussed. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference26 articles.

1. Increasing trends in plural births in the United States;S E Jewell;Obstet Gynecol,1995

2. The changing epidemiology of multiple births in the United States;R B Russell;Obstet Gynecol,2003

3. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy;J F Barrett;N Engl J Med,2013

4. Pregnancy-related mortality among women with multifetal pregnancies;A P MacKay;Obstet Gynecol,2006

5. The cost of twin pregnancy: maternal and neonatal factors;B Luke;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The optimal cutoff for intertwin delivery interval: A retrospective cohort study;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics;2024-01-23

2. Second-versus first-born twin: comparison of short- and long-term outcomes;Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics;2024-01-12

3. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies—a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study;American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology;2023-11

4. Twin Vaginal Deliveries in Labor Rooms: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis;American Journal of Perinatology;2021-04-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3