Ethical Considerations for Participatory Health through Social Media: Healthcare Workforce and Policy Maker Perspectives

Author:

Rivera-Romero Octavio1,Konstantinidis Stathis2,Denecke Kerstin3,Gabarrón Elia4,Petersen Carolyn5,Househ Mowafa6,Merolli Mark7,Mayer Miguel Ángel8

Affiliation:

1. Computer Engineering School, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain

2. University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

3. Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland

4. Norwegian Centre of E-Health Research, University Hospital North Norway, Norway

5. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

6. College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar

7. Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

8. Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Summary Objectives: To identify the different ethical issues that should be considered in participatory health through social media from different stakeholder perspectives (i.e., patients/service users, health professionals, health information technology (If) professionals, and policy makers) in any healthcare context. Methods: We implemented a two-round survey composed of open ended questions in the first round, aggregated into a list of ethical issues rated for importance by participants in the second round, to generate a ranked list of possible ethical issues in participatory health based on healthcare professionals’ and policy makers’ opinions on both their own point of view and their beliefs for other stakeholders’ perspectives. Results: Twenty-six individuals responded in the first round of the survey. Multiple ethical issues were identified for each perspective. Data privacy, data security, and digital literacy were common themes in all perspectives. Thirty-three individuals completed the second round of the survey. Data privacy and data security were ranked among the three most important ethical issues in all perspectives. Quality assurance was the most important issue from the healthcare professionals’ perspective and the second most important issue from the patients’ perspective. Data privacy was the most important consideration for patients/service users. Digital literacy was ranked as the fourth most important issue, except for policy makers’ perspective. Conclusions: Different stakeholders’ opinions fairly agreed that there are common ethical issues that should be considered across the four groups (patients, healthcare professionals, health IT professionals, policy makers) such as data privacy, security, and quality assurance.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Patient Participation, Engagement and Activation: Increased emphasis on the role of patients in healthcare;A Finset;Patient Educ Couns,2017

2. When “patient centred” is no longer enough: The challenge of collaborative health: An essay by Michael L Millenson;M L Millenson;BMJ,2017

3. Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness;G Eysenbach;J Med Internet Res,2008

4. Social media: A review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care;F J Grajales;J Med Internet Res,2014

5. Using Social Media While Waiting in Pain: A Clinical 12-Week Longitudinal Pilot Study;M Merolli;JMIR Res Protoc,2015

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3