Tale of Two Patent Ductus Arteriosus Severity Scores: Similarities and Differences

Author:

Fink Daniel1,El-Khuffash Afif23,McNamara Patrick45,Nitzan Itamar6,Hammerman Cathy67

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

2. Department of Neonatology, Rotunda Hospital, Rotunda, Dublin, Ireland

3. Department of Pediatrics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

4. Division of Neonatology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. Departments of Physiology and Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Department of Neonatology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

7. Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Abstract

Introduction Several echocardiographic scoring systems have been developed to assess the severity of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) shunting in preterm infants. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the ability of two different scoring systems to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of the PDA and to predict long-term PDA-associated morbidities. Subjects El-Khuffash cohort (previously described) was derived from a multicenter, prospective, observational study conducted in tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Ireland, Canada, and Australia. Results A total of 141 infants with a mean gestational age of 26 ± 1.4 weeks and a mean birth weight of 952 ± 235 g were evaluated on day 2 of life. The two scores were well correlated with each other and both scores positively predicted chronic lung disease/death in this population. Conclusion There appears to be an overall stepwise progression in the incidence of poor outcome parameters from “closed” to “borderline” to “hemodynamically significant” PDA. Both the El-Khuffash and Shaare Zedek scores are predictive of PDA-associated morbidities.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3