Validation of the German version of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ)

Author:

Kanniess Frank1,Defosse Kerstin2,Lommatzsch Marek3,Schultz Thomas4,Timmermann Hartmut5,Schmidt Olaf6,Heindl Stefan7,Baumann Hans Jörg8,Buhl Roland9,Taube Christian10,Höing Fabian2ORCID,Korn Stephanie

Affiliation:

1. Gemeinschaftspraxis Reinfeld, Reinfeld, Germany

2. Respiratory and Immunology, AstraZeneca Germany, Hamburg, Germany

3. Pneumology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany

4. MECS Research GmbH, Berlin, Germany

5. Pneumologicum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

6. Pneumologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Koblenz, Germany

7. Pneumologische Praxis Gauting, Gauting, Germany

8. Pneumologische Praxis Bremen, Bremen, Germany

9. Klinik für Pneumologie, Zentrum für Thoraxerkrankungen, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany

10. Ruhrlandklinik – Klinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ), a 10-item, equally weighted, yes/no tool assessing symptom impairment and risk of exacerbations in patients with asthma aged ≥12 years, was developed and validated in a US patient population to evaluate varying levels of asthma control. This study aimed to validate the German language version of the AIRQ in patients aged ≥12 years with different levels of asthma control. Methods A cross-sectional, observational, multi-centre study comprising a single visit was conducted in multiple specialised asthma centres and general practices in Germany. A total of 300 patients completed the following measures: 1) Patient Sociodemographic and Clinical Questionnaire, 2) AIRQ, 3) Asthma Control Test (ACT), and 4) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the AIRQ score cut points with the greatest predictive validity in discriminating between different control levels relative to a standard of ACT plus prior-year exacerbations or ACQ-6 plus prior-year exacerbations. Results The German version of the AIRQ demonstrated a robust capability to correctly identify well-controlled versus not well- or very poorly controlled (AUC values of 0.90 or higher) and well- or not well-controlled versus very poorly controlled asthma (AUC values of 0.89 or higher). Conclusions The German version of the AIRQ is a suitable tool to identify adults with varying levels of asthma control, which in turn can help to accurately identify patients with uncontrolled asthma in clinical practice.

Funder

AstraZeneca Germany

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3