Duty Rosters and Workloads of Obstetricians in Germany: Results of a Germany-wide Survey

Author:

Neimann Johannes1,Knabl Julia23,Puppe Julian4,Bayer Christian5,Gass Paul5,Gabriel Lena6,Seelbach-Goebel Birgit7,Lermann Johannes5,Schott Sarah8910

Affiliation:

1. Frauenklinik mit Brustzentrum, KRH Klinikum Siloah, Hannover, Germany

2. Klinikum der Universität München Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Campus Innenstadt, München, Germany

3. Department of Obstetrics, Klinik Hallerwiese, Nürnberg, Germany

4. Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany

5. Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

6. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany

7. Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder – Klinik St. Hedwig, Lehrstuhl für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

8. Universitätsfrauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

9. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany

10. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background Compiling a daily hospital roster which complies with existing laws and tariff regulations and meets the requirements for ongoing professional training while also taking the legal regulations on the health of employees into account makes planning the duty roster a challenge. The aim of this study was to obtain a realistic picture of existing duty roster systems and of the current workloads of obstetricians in Germany. Method This online survey was sent to 2770 physicians training to become obstetricians or specializing in specific areas of obstetric care. The survey consisted of an anonymized 95-item questionnaire which collected data on different types of duty roster systems and the workload of obstetricians in Germany for the period from 17.02.2015 to 16.05.2015. Results Out of a total of 2770 physicians who were contacted, 437 (16%) completed the questionnaire. Across all forms of care, the care provided outside normal working hours usually (75%) consisted of a combination of regular working times and on-call duty or even consisted entirely of standby duty. Level I perinatal centers were most likely 20% (n = 88) to have a shift system in place. Working a shift system was significantly more common in care facilities which had previously carried out a job analysis. The number of physicians in hospitals who are present during the night shift was higher in facilities with higher numbers of births and in facilities which offered higher levels of care. In addition to regularly working overtime and the fact that often not all the hours worked were recorded, it was notable that the systems used to compile duty rosters often did not comply with legal regulations or with collectively agreed working hours nor were they compatible with the staff planning requirements. Outlook The results of this study show that the conditions of work, the working times, and the organization of working times in obstetric departments are in need of improvement. Recording the actual times worked together with an analysis of the activities performed during working times and while on standby would increase the level of transparency for employers and employees.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynaecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3