Surgical Approaches to Resection of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Comparative Meta-analysis of the Endoscopic Endonasal versus Transcranial and Unilateral versus Bilateral Approaches

Author:

Brown Nolan J.1ORCID,Pennington Zach2,Patel Saarang1,Kuo Cathleen3,Chakravarti Sachiv4,Bui Nicholas E.5,Gendreau Julian6,Van Gompel Jamie J.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States

2. Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States

3. School of Medicine, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine, Buffalo, New York, United States

4. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

5. Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, United States

6. Division of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Here we systematically review the extant literature to highlight the advantages of bilateral versus unilateral approaches and endoscopic endonasal (midline) approaches versus transcranial approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas, focusing on complications, extent of resection, and local recurrence rates. Methods Three databases were queried to identify all primary prospective trials and retrospective series comparing outcomes following endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approaches and unilateral versus bilateral craniotomy for surgical resection of olfactory groove meningiomas. All articles were screened by two independent authors and selected for formal analysis according to predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results Seven studies comprising 288 total patients (mean age 55.0 ± 24.6 years) met criteria for inclusion. In the three comparing the endoscopic endonasal (n = 21) versus transcranial (n = 32) approaches, there was no significant difference between the two with respect to gross total resection (p = 0.34) or rates of Simpson Grade 1 resection (p = 0.69). EEA demonstrated higher rates of overall complications (p < 0.01) including postoperative infection (p = 0.03). In the four studies comparing bilateral (n = 117) versus unilateral approaches (n = 118), overall complication rates (p < 0.01) and disease recurrence (p = 0.01) were higher with bilateral approaches. All surgery-related mortalities also occurred in the bilateral cohort (n = 7, 7.14%). Gross total resection (p = 0.63) and Simpson grade (p = 0.48) were comparable between approaches. Olfaction preservation was superior for unilateral approaches (p < 0.01). Conclusions Though the literature is limited, current evidence suggests that the endoscopic endonasal approach may be favorable over conventional craniotomy for select olfactory groove meningioma patients. Where craniotomy is used, unilateral approaches appear to reduce complications and the risk of olfaction loss.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Reference43 articles.

1. The evolution of endoscopic endonasal approach for olfactory groove meningiomas;P-O Champagne;Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown),2023

2. Olfactory groove meningioma: report of 99 cases surgically treated at the Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome;R Pallini;World Neurosurg,2015

3. Cortical resection with electrocorticography for intractable porencephaly-related partial epilepsy;K Iida;Epilepsia,2005

4. Staged resection of difficult-to-treat intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review of the indications, surgical approaches, and postoperative outcomes;J L Gendreau;J Neurol Surg B Skull Base,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3