Validation of a Portable Respiratory Monitoring System for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Crossectional Study

Author:

Silva Marcus Vinicius F.P.1,Lustosa Thais Clementino1,Lins-Filho Ozeas Lima1ORCID,Clímaco Danielle Cristina Silva2,Patriota Tarcya Couto1,Magalhães Jessica Amorim1,Queiroga Fernando3,Cabral Marilia Montenegro4,Medeiros Ana Kelley1,Neto Luiz Oliveira1,Rodrigues Valesca Kehrle1,Drager Luciano F.5,Pedrosa Rodrigo Pinto

Affiliation:

1. Sleep and Heart Laboratory, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

2. Otavio de Freitas Hospital, Recife, PE, Brazil

3. Osvaldo Cruz Tertiary Hospital, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

4. PROCAPE, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

5. Unidade de Hipertensão, Instituto do Coração(InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Portable respiratory monitoring (PM) has been used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the general population. However, its validation in patients with both OSA and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), remains unclear. Objective The aim of the study was to validate PM for the diagnosis of OSA in patients with COPD. Materials and Methods In this crossectional study, COPD patients were submitted simultaneously to polysomnography (PSG) and PM. Moreover, the risk for OSA was verified by the Berlin, NoSAS, and STOP-BANG questionnaires. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for PM were calculated for the cutoff points of the hypopnea apnea index (AHI) of 5, 15, and 30 events/hour, as well as for the questionnaires. The Bland-Altman test and correlation analyses between the AHI of the PSG and PM were performed. Results A total of 103 patients were evaluated (age 67.5 ± 9.9 years, 60% men). The STOP-BANG questionnaire had the highest sensitivity for OSA diagnosis, at 94.4% (72.7–99.9%). The sensitivity of PM decreased (87.0, 66.7, and 44.4%), and the specificity increased 40.0, 78.6, and 100.0%) as the AHI cutoff point increased from 5, 15, and 30. The Bland-Altman test indicated good limits of agreement (AHI = 5.5 ± 11.7 events/hour). Therefore, the AHI results of the PM showed a strong and positive correlation with those of the PSG (r = 0.70, p < 0.0001). Conclusion The PM test can be a useful tool for OSA diagnosis in patients with COPD.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3