Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline – Update 2020

Author:

Spada Cristiano12,Hassan Cesare3,Bellini Davide4,Burling David5,Cappello Giovanni6,Carretero Cristina7,Dekker Evelien8,Eliakim Rami9,de Haan Margriet10,Kaminski Michal F.11,Koulaouzidis Anastasios12,Laghi Andrea13,Lefere Philippe14,Mang Thomas15,Milluzzo Sebastian Manuel12,Morrin Martina16,McNamara Deirdre17,Neri Emanuele18,Pecere Silvia2,Pioche Mathieu19,Plumb Andrew20,Rondonotti Emanuele21,Spaander Manon CW22,Taylor Stuart20,Fernandez-Urien Ignacio23,van Hooft Jeanin E.24,Stoker Jaap25,Regge Daniele626

Affiliation:

1. Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy

2. Department of Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

3. Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy

4. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, La Sapienza University of Rome, Diagnostic Imaging Unit, I.C.O.T. Hospital Latina, Italy

5. St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, London, UK

6. Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy

7. Department of Gastroenterology. University of Navarre Clinic, Healthcare Research Institute of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain

8. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center location AMC, The Netherlands

9. Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center , Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel

10. Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

11. Departments of Gastroenterological Oncology and Cancer Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

12. Endoscopy Unit, Centre for Liver and Digestive Disorders, University Hospitals, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK

13. Department of Surgical-Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, La Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

14. Department of Radiology, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Roeselare, Belgium

15. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

16. RCSI Radiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

17. TAGG Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

18. Diagnostic Radiology 3, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Italy

19. Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

20. Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK

21. Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy

22. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

23. Gastroenterology, Hospital de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

24. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands

25. Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

26. University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy

Abstract

Main recommendations 1 ESGE/ESGAR recommend computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend barium enema in this setting.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 2 ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC, preferably the same or next day, if colonoscopy is incomplete. The timing depends on an interdisciplinary decision including endoscopic and radiological factors.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR suggests that, in centers with expertise in and availability of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), CCE preferably the same or the next day may be considered if colonoscopy is incomplete.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 3 When colonoscopy is contraindicated or not possible, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable and equally sensitive alternative for patients with alarm symptoms.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.Because of lack of direct evidence, ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend CCE in this situation.Very low quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable alternative to colonoscopy for patients with non-alarm symptoms.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.In centers with availability, ESGE/ESGAR suggests that CCE may be considered in patients with non-alarm symptoms.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 4 Where there is no organized fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based population colorectal screening program, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an option for colorectal cancer screening, providing the screenee is adequately informed about test characteristics, benefits, and risks, and depending on local service- and patient-related factors.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR do not suggest CCE as a first-line screening test for colorectal cancer.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 5 ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC in the case of a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or FIT with incomplete or unfeasible colonoscopy, within organized population screening programs.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR also suggest the use of CCE in this setting based on availability.Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 6 ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC with intravenous contrast medium injection for surveillance after curative-intent resection of colorectal cancer only in patients in whom colonoscopy is contraindicated or unfeasibleWeak recommendation, low quality evidence.There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in this setting.Very low quality evidence. 7 ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC in patients with high risk polyps undergoing surveillance after polypectomy only when colonoscopy is unfeasible.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in post-polypectomy surveillance.Very low quality evidence. 8 ESGE/ESGAR recommend against CTC in patients with acute colonic inflammation and in those who have recently undergone colorectal surgery, pending a multidisciplinary evaluation.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 9 ESGE/ESGAR recommend referral for endoscopic polypectomy in patients with at least one polyp ≥ 6 mm detected at CTC or CCE.Follow-up CTC may be clinically considered for 6 – 9-mm CTC-detected lesions if patients do not undergo polypectomy because of patient choice, comorbidity, and/or low risk profile for advanced neoplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3