White light computer-aided optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice

Author:

Rondonotti Emanuele1,Bergna Irene Maria Bambina,Paggi Silvia1,Amato ArnaldoORCID,Andrealli Alida1,Scardino Giulia1,Tamanini Giacomo1,Lenoci Nicoletta1,Mandelli Giovanna1,Terreni Natalia1,Rocchetto SImone,Piagnani Alessandra,Di Paolo Dhanai1,Bina Niccolò1,Filippi Emanuela2,Ambrosiani Luciana2,Hassan Cesare,Correale Loredana3,Radaelli Franco1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy

2. Pathology Department, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy

3. Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems could make the optical diagnosis (OD) of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) more reliable and objective. This study was aimed at prospectively evaluating feasibility and diagnostic performance of AI-standalone and AI-assisted OD of DCPs in a real-life setting by using a white light-based system (GI Genius, Medtronic Co, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). Patients and methods Consecutive colonoscopy outpatients with at least one DCP were evaluated by 11 endoscopists (5 experts and 6 non-experts in OD). DCPs were classified in real time by AI (AI-standalone OD) and by the endoscopist with the assistance of AI (AI-assisted OD), with histopathology as the reference standard. Results Of the 480 DCPs, AI provided the outcome “adenoma” or “non-adenoma” in 81.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.5–84.6). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of AI-standalone OD were 97.0% (95% CI 94.0–98.6), 38.1% (95% CI 28.9–48.1), 80.1% (95% CI 75.2–84.2), 83.3% (95% CI 69.2–92.0), and 80.5% (95% CI 68.7–82.8%), respectively. Compared with AI-standalone, the specificity of AI-assisted OD was significantly higher (58.9%, 95% CI 49.7–67.5) and a trend toward an increase was observed for other diagnostic performance measures. Overall accuracy and negative predictive value of AI-assisted OD for experts and non-experts were 85.8% (95% CI 80.0–90.4) vs. 80.1% (95% CI 73.6–85.6) and 89.1% (95% CI 75.6–95.9) vs. 80.0% (95% CI 63.9–90.4), respectively. Conclusions Standalone AI is able to provide an OD of adenoma/non-adenoma in more than 80% of DCPs, with a high sensitivity but low specificity. The human-machine interaction improved diagnostic performance, especially when experts were involved.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3